People keep going back to "he deserved the ban", but nobody's arguing that he didn't deserve it. Hell, the streamer himself said he deserved it. People keep going back to "ban all third party applications", that's an entirely different discussion: stop bringing it up.

What people are asking for clarification on is what constitutes valid and acceptable evidence from a source outside of the game for a report, because they never accepted it in the past and are now using it as grounds for a report. Whether it's a video or a screenshot or whatever, tell us. It's true that there will be people that twist the rule to avoid punishment. There will be people who hide their actions in other places as a result. However, if video evidence is now allowed for specific TOS violations, then people that stream need to know that since it subjects that subset of players specifically to a higher standard that people that don't stream are not. Even for people that don't stream, it's something to know so people that observe certain behavior ingame know that it is valid for a report. I'm not even talking about just RMT. If you see another player that is clearly not part of the RMT swarm but is hacking or botting, is taking a video valid evidence now or will it simply be ignored since they'll only accept video evidence for a specific subset of TOS violations?

Obscurity in how they catch violators and how the STF identifies members of the bot swarm is fine. I don't have a problem with that. Obscurity in how they enforce their own rules? That's absolutely insane.