Thread: Butt is flat again... Patch 5.15

Originally Posted by LaylaTsarra

How about we wait for tomorrow and see what he has to say. Obviously the issue has hit a nerve and they are aware of the outcry. It certainly got on their radar. Butts are important to people! I suspect they'll fix it where they can or revert it.

I am extremely happy if that is true, him willing to explain why they changed those bottoms. As for if they will stay changed or not? Well, if they go back to how it was previously, that would be great. But it’s less likely he will talk about a butt slider possibility. If they don’t however decide to go back to the old bottoms, the only thing that would calm the community down would be the early announcement of a butt slider, or, him saying they will implement “bigger rear” items in the future.

I don’t know, I kind of have a bad feeling about this one. If I’m honest? I think it won’t go back to the way it was, and he won’t mention any possibility of a butt slider, or butt modified items. Maybe I’m being too cynical, I’m not sure.

Originally Posted by Iscah

Having no personal interest in "butts" (I have one, I sit on it), I'm amazed just how much discussion goes into them around here...

"Having no interest in the side lives of NPCs it's amazing how certain forums dedicate themselves to them" You do understand that we all don't share the same interests and though we can have many interests in one thing? If it isn't that important, there was no reason to dedicate a coffer to them in raid, that gave the INCENTIVE to run that raid multiple times instead of only running it for the item drops that week. If glamour wasn't important, then there wouldn't be contests, websites showing gear etc... not just from fans but by the company itself.

Also you're eating some weird-shaped pancakes if smaller-but-still-curved is "pancake-shaped".

Shape is not the equivalent of depth. Circle is not a Sphere.

A pancake is often referred to a FLAT object talking about its DEPTH. While Shape (round) is also its feature, they're not synonymous terms.

It would be as ridiculous as coming in and chiding people about how someone describes that characters run like feathers (describing weight) and exclaiming "I don't know where you people come from where people look like feathers!"

Indeed. We discussed it a while ago and concluded that it's misleading due to different poses in the two images - the 1.0 girl is stretching (torso forward, legs slightly bent) which makes her look bigger compared to the neutral pose.

It's not that misleading actually, and what you're PERPETUATING however, IS. Neither rear was large, there hasn't been an argument about it being HUGE, in 1.0 There was however an argument about what was largER is now missing.

See youtube post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hV_...youtu.be&t=509



The body's internal balance is a recognizable thing in anatomy, especially artistically (to the point, yes some embellishments may occur) my other post also showed this later but I'm sure it was skipped.

So yes, the appearance of the rear is actually kinda important to people aesthetically not because people just like looking at butts, but also because it balances out the human body.

Thankfully later posts from you are more well reasoned, but I was seriously disappointed in seeing this kind of condescending passive aggressive response from you.

Originally Posted by SturmChurro

I don't understand what you are trying to do here. You know how many times I get falsely reported on these forums? It is your opinion that it isn't a fix, it is my opinion it is a fix. Get over it. It is my opinion it is not a feature, it is your opinion it is. It is now "gas lighting" for having differing opinions than that of the supposed majority I guess.

I do not take kindly to threats, and I will not respond as I used to. The 2b butt is not that big of a deal, okay. OKAY? It is only flattened on long tops, and why would it only be flattened on long tops? To prevent clipping! It is a "fix" you might not classify it as such, IN YOUR OPINION, but it is.

Threatening me over a differing opinion, or an exclamation point.

Maybe to you it isn't but I'm pretty sure there is more against what he did to it than for it. Why in first place did he even touch it when there still way more stuff that needs fixed before it. Sounds like wastefulness to me. I never had one problem with it ever clipping not like how 90% other stuff clips and is never fixed. Since thought need fix clipping to it now he better fix all the clipping problems to all other gear and how long hair clips all the time.