[Request] Underwear Customisation!

[CazzT]

It's discriminatory. Why would you have an issue with scantily clad male characters but not scantily clad female characters?

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.
If him saying he wants to see less skimpy roes is "discriminatory" then you saying you want to see more is also discriminatory because you're ignoring the opinions of others in the way you're accusing him of. Don't be a hypocrite.

[Theodric]

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.

It is - and it also has nothing to do with tumblr, either.

If you're fine with scantily clad female characters being present in the game then you should be fine with scantily clad male characters also being present. What are you so afraid of?

Roegadyn don't even do anything for me. I think they're way too oversized, comically so in fact. Though it doesn't bother me if people want to run around as scantily clad roegadyn and reading between the lines it's pretty clear what the real issue is in these sorts of one sided cases.

[CazzT]

It is - and it also has nothing to do with tumblr, either.

If you're fine with scantily clad female characters being present in the game then you should be fine with scantily clad male characters also being present. What are you so afraid of?

Roegadyn don't even do anything for me. I think they're way too oversized, comically so in fact. Though it doesn't bother me if people want to run around as scantily clad roegadyn and reading between the lines it's pretty clear what the real issue is in these sorts of one sided cases.

No, it is not. You're being a hypocrite. You're telling someone they're being a bigot because they want to see less of something. There is nothing bigoted or discriminatory about that. But if you're going to maintain that there is, then it is equally discriminatory to want to force others to see what you want to see. Also, he said nothing about seeing more or less of skimpy female outfits, you just made the assumption he does. You're in the wrong here, Theo.

Sounds like personal hangups to me. Not a really good place to cast judgment from.

I agree. Which is why I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see more or less of something. But the accusation of bigotry is uncalled for.

[rachcouture]

No, it is not. You're being a hypocrite. You're telling someone they're being a bigot because they want to see less of something. There is nothing bigoted or discriminatory about that. But if you're going to maintain that there is, then it is equally discriminatory to want to force others to see what you want to see. Also, he said nothing about seeing more or less of skimpy female outfits, you just made the assumption he does. You're in the wrong here, Theo.

I agree. Which is why I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see more or less of something. But the accusation of bigotry is uncalled for.

He didn't call anyone a bigot, though; he just said it's discriminatory to be okay with it for one gender, and not for the other, which it often is in this situation since it tends to coincide with a fear of all things LGBT. It's still a pretty common insecurity.

That said, as a girl that likes cute lingerie: undergarment equip slots are super underrated. I wish more games had them.

[rachcouture]

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.
If him saying he wants to see less skimpy roes is "discriminatory" then you saying you want to see more is also discriminatory because you're ignoring the opinions of others in the way you're accusing him of. Don't be a hypocrite.

Sounds like personal hangups to me. Not a really good place to cast judgment from.

[Kohl]

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.
If him saying he wants to see less skimpy roes is "discriminatory" then you saying you want to see more is also discriminatory because you're ignoring the opinions of others in the way you're accusing him of. Don't be a hypocrite.

Theodric's comment is not discriminatory at all, Magnedeus is entitled to, and has expressed, their opinion, it isn't being suppressed. It is being challenged on whether or not it is a discriminatory opinion.

It was pointed out that this is a public forum, this is true, and when anyone speaks publicly, they are subject to the reaction of their words. The consequence of communicating is that it opens up opinions to being challenged.

This is the way.