[Request] Underwear Customisation!

[SturmChurro]

Yes, male characters especially could use a whole new selection of briefs and boxers!

[Alucard135]

Are you telling me that I'll be required to change my underwear now?! The last time I did, it caused the sixth umbral calamity.

[SturmChurro]

Are you telling me that I'll be required to change my underwear now?! The last time I did, it caused the sixth umbral calamity.

I get it. The underwear we have now is a little yellow to hide the pee stains.

[XenoSamurai]

I just wish we could dye them, they are such an ugly white.

[hynaku]

Tera online added a armor slot just for underwear. There is all sorts of them to pick from and they give a defense boost. Maybe they could get rid of extra ring and make that slot for under garments.

[Magnedeus]

Why would it be an issue? I'm not into women, though I don't screech at the sight of scantily clad viera/miqo'te/au ra when I happen to encounter them in a roulette or out in the game world.

I'd respectfully suggest that instead of denying people who like men their own eye candy you instead spend time addressing such insecurities.

This is a public forum and i can say whatever i want as long as it's within the TOS. It's my opinion and if i don't wanna see something, then i don't want to see it. If that's how you roll, then you do you. And i respectfully suggest you respect others opinions instead of chastising them on it.

[Theodric]

This is a public forum and i can say whatever i want as long as it's within the TOS. It's my opinion and if i don't wanna see something, then i don't want to see it. If that's how you roll, then you do you. And i respectfully suggest you respect others opinions instead of chastising them on it.

It's discriminatory. Why would you have an issue with scantily clad male characters but not scantily clad female characters?

[CazzT]

It's discriminatory. Why would you have an issue with scantily clad male characters but not scantily clad female characters?

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.
If him saying he wants to see less skimpy roes is "discriminatory" then you saying you want to see more is also discriminatory because you're ignoring the opinions of others in the way you're accusing him of. Don't be a hypocrite.

[Theodric]

No, it is not discriminatory. Leave that garbage on tumblr, please.

It is - and it also has nothing to do with tumblr, either.

If you're fine with scantily clad female characters being present in the game then you should be fine with scantily clad male characters also being present. What are you so afraid of?

Roegadyn don't even do anything for me. I think they're way too oversized, comically so in fact. Though it doesn't bother me if people want to run around as scantily clad roegadyn and reading between the lines it's pretty clear what the real issue is in these sorts of one sided cases.

[CazzT]

It is - and it also has nothing to do with tumblr, either.

If you're fine with scantily clad female characters being present in the game then you should be fine with scantily clad male characters also being present. What are you so afraid of?

Roegadyn don't even do anything for me. I think they're way too oversized, comically so in fact. Though it doesn't bother me if people want to run around as scantily clad roegadyn and reading between the lines it's pretty clear what the real issue is in these sorts of one sided cases.

No, it is not. You're being a hypocrite. You're telling someone they're being a bigot because they want to see less of something. There is nothing bigoted or discriminatory about that. But if you're going to maintain that there is, then it is equally discriminatory to want to force others to see what you want to see. Also, he said nothing about seeing more or less of skimpy female outfits, you just made the assumption he does. You're in the wrong here, Theo.

Sounds like personal hangups to me. Not a really good place to cast judgment from.

I agree. Which is why I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see more or less of something. But the accusation of bigotry is uncalled for.