Why use a Dragoon or Monk when you can use a Warrior?

[SirOleas]

Really? Because I'm pretty sure it makes complete sense.

What happens when all of your enmity reduce skills happen to be on cool-down.
It is a glass cannon, so when you DO pull enmity your screwed if you cant stop something from attacking you.
The BEST solution is to keep it stunned until you can successfully rid yourself of enmity.
That particular combo is not meant JUST for damage, its meant as a safty net.

I think people need to look closer at how things work in this game because they obviously arnt.
I haven't even maxed my classes but by reading skill descriptions, you can get a great estimate as to how something is supposed to be used.

SE has built multiple prevenative measures into each class. This is why DRG gets SO much enmity reduce. Yes, there may be an already low chance for something to hit you IF everything is going according to plan.

Why would that matter when Leg Sweep is an AoE stun with a 30 second recast?
You can stun it with leg sweep regardless of enmity.
If the mobs facing you leg sweep is actually easier to pull off to begin with lol.

Why even bother making your second stun require you to have the highest enmity in the party when you already have one that doesn't?

Especially since both stuns require a combo that puts you IN FRONT OF THE MOB! When would you not use leg sweep to stun when the mob will always technically be facing you due to combo requirements? Doubly especially when you're good at DRG you don't have high enmity unless you have a fail tank? (In which case other jobs will have higher enmity than DRG anyway, Such as WHM or BLM who generate a lot more enmity than DRG.)

Perhaps you should look at things more closely.