Results 1 to 10 of 1173

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Myono_Mhigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    26
    Character
    Valarie Glitterbits
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    I totally agree with Nadrojj. I'm one of those who never got to HNM's in XI, atleast not the ones your referring to. Fafnir, never seen it. Not that I didn't try, but EVERY HNM LS on XI didn't just ask if you bot but REQUIRED it. I applied many times on multiple servers and everytime, denied. Why? would not/could not bot. I loved the "idea" of HNMs but the application left many out of the loop.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Xatsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    2,011
    Character
    Xatsh Vei
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Myono_Mhigo View Post
    I totally agree with Nadrojj. I'm one of those who never got to HNM's in XI, atleast not the ones your referring to. Fafnir, never seen it. Not that I didn't try, but EVERY HNM LS on XI didn't just ask if you bot but REQUIRED it. I applied many times on multiple servers and everytime, denied. Why? would not/could not bot. I loved the "idea" of HNMs but the application left many out of the loop.
    HNMs in XI were fundamentally flawed as it was impossible to stop bots. And HNM Shells more or less were forced to bot against each other. If 1 group did it you either watched them claim or compete against them on an equal level (Required you to break ToS and bot as well). If 1 shell got a $3,000+ packet bot another shell had to buy 1 to compete. It was a crazy cycle and clearly a poorly designed system that developed. (worked fine if there was no bots though).

    If SE does add hnms, I hope it is in a way that the scenario you mentioned does not occur. The bots wars should be prevented in every way possible without removing the enjoyment of the event itself. Aka Bots are not a good reason to not add nm spawns or instance everything.

    SE was getting really good ideas that made botting alot harder to do towards the end of the game (Considering Abysea the end of XI.. that sorta changed the whole game). They need to expand that more. I feel bots might not be able to be removed 100% but they can develop content to the level bots hardly add any higher chance of claiming.
    (2)

  3. 01-28-2013 04:22 AM

  4. #4
    Player
    Blackpearlguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    87
    Character
    Ark Elladan
    World
    Ultros
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Evangeline View Post
    Not everybody in a HNM LS botted. I'm pretty sure you just had to be open to botting (meaning accept botting and don't GM your own LS members). If you were willing to bot, then +1 for your application.

    Unless if you were playing on 360/PS2, stating "would not/could not bot" on your application just makes it sound like you were 100% against botting. Yes, that's fine since you're entitled to your own opinion. However, it certainly didn't help your application.
    So much of this I know a guy who use to know a guy that was in a HNMLS who botted, however he did not, and he had more claims on his ps2!

    Anyways I saw a post somewhere saying that Behemoth will be a FATE NM? Haven't been able to dig up any more details I just saw it in a post on BG with some other faq that has been proven true.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    KiraHime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    91
    Character
    Kira Hime
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackpearlguy View Post
    Anyways I saw a post somewhere saying that Behemoth will be a FATE NM? Haven't been able to dig up any more details I just saw it in a post on BG with some other faq that has been proven true.
    http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...l=1#post945001

    ^^
    (1)