Highly Notorious Monsters

[CrystalWeapon]

I didn't call you wrong because of what you said being wrong. Although it was. I called you wrong anticipating you would find the proof, which in turn prooved you were wrong.

I know they asked a question about content that was 100% based on the changing of the claiming system.

I knew they had already changed the claiming system before I asked you.

I know they have no plans in the future to change the claiming system.

I know if the question is absolutely dependent on, and specifically conditional to the claiming system changing, which we all know is not planned on happening. Then we all know your point referencing an ancient question, with non-applicable conditions, is well, not applicable.

We all already know Odin Is to be open world. Its going to happen. Argueing aginst Open world content is kind of futile and a little one sided. Argueing for reasonable equality in both instanced and open world is really the only logical arguement.

They changed the claiming system AFTER that poll ... I don't even anymore... Did you even play the game back then? lol

I'm also not arguing against open world content. The ONLY thing I have ever argued against in this thread was unnecessarily long timmers. Even in the recent posts I've made tonight I've continually supported the system I just don't agree with it needing long timmers. Shall I go back over a year ago and pull out replies I gave in a similar topic? I believe my stance was the same back then. "Notorious Monsters should be Notorious because of how difficult they are, not because of how Notoriously late they are at spawning."

I'll say it again (this time I'll bold it so you actually read my stance on this issue):
World NMs: Yes, Please.
Special condition pops: Yes, Please.
Force pops: Yes, Please.
Large timmers for the sake of a cheap thrill: Thanks for the offer, but I'll have to pass.

[Coglin]

They changed the claiming system AFTER that poll ... I don't even anymore... Did you even play the game back then? lol


World NMs: Yes, Please.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Thats mypoint. If they changed the claiming system after the poll (which we know they did) then the poll question is definently irrelavent.

Read the question outloud. Word for word.

You used that question previously, as well as others, to foolishly attept to claim that a large portion of active players want strictly instanced content.

Now when you read that outload to yourself, you did say the part about the claiming system change right? that was conditional to the question. Since the question was before the change. Now that its after the change, its no longer relavent. Because a condition of a claiming system change is the only way its relavent.

I appreciate what you said in red though. Its a little confussing at times, you come into the thread bashing the idea of HNMs, and now you specifically say your for Open NMs? I assume you mean HNMs?

Yet then you offer your support for them only conditionally of the fact that they only spawn under special circumstances?

It somewhat makes your position dificult to judge.

Are you for open world HNMs or against them?