Results 1 to 10 of 1173

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Alerith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,187
    Character
    Alerith Rayneheart
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 50
    So...from the way I see it, this thread is divided into two groups:

    Those who want HNMs and would do them if they were implemented.
    Those who don't want HNMs, but regardless of if they were implemented or not, it doesn't affect them.

    Hmmmm....
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Wynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,977
    Character
    Aedan Yarborough
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Alerith View Post
    So...from the way I see it, this thread is divided into two groups:

    Those who want HNMs and would do them if they were implemented.
    Those who don't want HNMs, but regardless of if they were implemented or not, it doesn't affect them.

    Hmmmm....
    I don't believe it is that simple.

    If you have long spawn HNMs well...they better have something good on them to warrant camping them right? Cause we all know hardcore gamers aren't in it just for the lulz, they want loot. Really good loot.

    So now you have the "best" loot that people must have or be "gimp" and suddenly it is no longer not affecting people that don't want HNMs now is it?
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    Dubberrucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    33
    Character
    Dubber Rucky
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Alerith View Post
    So...from the way I see it, this thread is divided into two groups:

    Those who want HNMs and would do them if they were implemented.
    Those who don't want HNMs, but regardless of if they were implemented or not, it doesn't affect them.

    Hmmmm....
    You missed the other group. Those of us who have posted in support giving HNM hunters their HNMs but wouldn't camp them if our lives depended on it. But this was probably an intentional oversight in order to flame the opposing side.
    (0)