Berserk Reduces Enmity

[Arasiel]

From what I gather Warrior out tanks Paladin due to raw DD. The Paladin is supposed to get buffed soon. However, for longer help to the Warrior I think Berserk should lower Enmity with each swing. Since we are pretty much gonna use Rampage while tanking anyways.

[JackDaniels]

Am I the only one who thinks that this doesn't make any sence at all?

+damage = -emnity?

[Peptaru]

I can understand what he's trying to convey, in that, yes berserk ups damage which = more enm+, but! if i were berserkin i'd love to have an enm- added to it. Do I think it's a good idea? No! I can understand why someone would want it. That would set rampage for tanking and berserk for DD. As it stands now berserk is an unused ability by me, and i'm sure by many others.

[Sortis]

I can understand what he's trying to convey, in that, yes berserk ups damage which = more enm+, but! if i were berserkin i'd love to have an enm- added to it. Do I think it's a good idea? No! I can understand why someone would want it. That would set rampage for tanking and berserk for DD. As it stands now berserk is an unused ability by me, and i'm sure by many others.

This makes no sense...that is exactly what it's meant for, they're essentially stances, Zerk being the DPS stance and Rampage being the tank stance...so why not?

[Peptaru]

This makes no sense...that is exactly what it's meant for, they're essentially stances, Zerk being the DPS stance and Rampage being the tank stance...so why not?

Why quote me? I was saying that i can understand where the OP comes from, its not my thing, so gtfo. I don't know any warriors that even use berserk now, unless they hate their whm.

[Sortis]

Why quote me? I was saying that i can understand where the OP comes from, its not my thing, so gtfo. I don't know any warriors that even use berserk now, unless they hate their whm.

Because zerk is for DD warriors, I don't think you understand Warrior is meant for more than tanking, they straddle the fence as they can DD and tank both, so zerk when you have a PLD and Rampage when you're tanking, what is so hard about that?

EDIT: If you get hit with zerk up it resets. You aren't supposed to tank with zerk lmao. He is saying he wants -enmity so he doesn't take a hit so he can keep doing damage un-molested.

[JackDaniels]

Because zerk is for DD warriors, I don't think you understand Warrior is meant for more than tanking, they straddle the fence as they can DD and tank both, so zerk when you have a PLD and Rampage when you're tanking, what is so hard about that?

You'd be suprised.

[Peptaru]

Because zerk is for DD warriors, I don't think you understand Warrior is meant for more than tanking, they straddle the fence as they can DD and tank both, so zerk when you have a PLD and Rampage when you're tanking, what is so hard about that?

EDIT: If you get hit with zerk up it resets. You aren't supposed to tank with zerk lmao. He is saying he wants -enmity so he doesn't take a hit so he can keep doing damage un-molested.

OMG again? why is this on me? I DON'T EVEN SUPPORT THIS IDEA so again, gtfo. I simply said that i can see where the OP was coming from with his desire..... save me raptor jesus, the stupid is getting more aggressive!

[JackDaniels]

Thats like saying I want my emnity lowered every time i cast cure lol.. but if its because pld is broken then its all good i guess? Infact lets just add negative emnity to everything that PLD doesnt use, then we wont have to adjust PLD

[Sortis]

Thats like saying I want my emnity lowered every time i cast cure lol.. but if its because pld is broken then its all good i guess? Infact lets just add negative emnity to everything that PLD doesnt use, then we wont have to adjust PLD

Yeah! haha and then we can give BLM a spell that does damage and makes them lose enmity! haha oh wait...they already did. Ooo ooo we can give a DD class an ability that makes them lose enmity...oh wait...archer got that huh? hmmm...