Idea: Merit system

[linay]

Ah, to clarify; I don't want to see abilities on Relic weapons. Well... Not exactly anyway... As I said earlier, I think the Eurekan Effect they added to the tail end of the Eurekan weapons was actually a really good idea (wish it was there from the start). That concept has a lot of potential to add interesting stats and mechanics to Relics, without threatening game balance. The Eureka weapon is by far the best weapon to use in Eureka because of that stat, but that doesn't mean it's the best weapon to use in raiding. If we get more Eureka style content (although if we do, I hope it isn't the only process for the Relic like Eureka was), I think it would be interesting to actually put abilities on the weapons (rather than the Logos system), they could just be Eurekan Effect abilities that only apply in that content. Perfect solution, really. It would make the weapon far more interesting than the "Oh it has more substats I don't care about" we normally get.

Heck, stats like that don't even need to be limited to Relics and combat content. Take Gold Saucer gear as an example. Purely cosmetic stuff, right? But why? Why not have "Increases the chance of winning Triple Triad cards" on a piece of equipment? "Increase Race Chocobo EXP"? "Increase Minion Drop Rate"? They could easily have gear obtained from anywhere, with interesting stats that have purpose, that have zero impact on combat balance. How excited do you think people would be to obtain something like an "Increase Mount Drop Rate" piece of gear? So much they could do with such concepts, but instead we're limited to effectively the same sets of gear ad nauseum.

Generally, I would agree to having different gears be useful for different content. Unfortunately, as a tradeoff for being able to play as all the jobs in one character, our inventory system is a weak point and having to keep different gears for different contents might not be a good thing.

Also, in term of exploration content, I'd hope they'd use the open world rather than have another instance that we need to queue for like Eureka. This expansion is perfect for open world exploration considering what we're doing with the raid.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

Generally, I would agree to having different gears be useful for different content. Unfortunately, as a tradeoff for being able to play as all the jobs in one character, our inventory system is a weak point and having to keep different gears for different contents might not be a good thing.

Also, in term of exploration content, I'd hope they'd use the open world rather than have another instance that we need to queue for like Eureka. This expansion is perfect for open world exploration considering what we're doing with the raid.

The problem with open world exploration is that the open world is finite.

Ever do a 2.0 relic when it was current? Having several hundred people vying after 10 kills of the same mob, of which only 3-5 spawn, is a nightmare. And that didn't include loot, which open world dungeons and the like would.


People complain about hunts and fates being zerg fests. What makes you think any meaningful content in the open world would be any different?

[PyurBlue]

See, the problem is I don't think that's true. We don't have a lot of different types of content, we have two types of content; Raiding, and everything else. Aside from 5 instances per patch cycle (4 Savage Raids + Ultimate), the rest of the game is just tuned to such an absurdly casual level. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with having casual content, just that I wish there was either some middle ground (there is a distinct lack of mid-tier content with any real purpose) or simply more hardcore content. Having i470 solely for 5 instances really doesn't cut it IMO.

Difficulty wise I agree, FF14 has a severe content gap. Even so I do feel some distinction between the different types of casual content. I don't participate in everything that the game offers because some of it isn't for me. For the most part I enjoy things at high level; Savage, EX, maps, hunts, dungeons. The latter is content that really needs some kind of intermediate difficulty. Expert dungeons tend to be a let down. Nearly everything on that list can be trivialized by 470 gear though.

Again, Relics are my solution over something like Merits. Problem is Relics are consistently delayed and increasingly dumbed down to such an utterly meaningless level...

I don't mind relics, while they're not the kind of thing I would pursue they also don't feel like a necessity. If they're going to be set aside as content for those who are looking for endgame progression, I'm completely fine with that.

What would you say to one piece of content that brings various pieces of content together? My ideal Relic quest is probably something like that... I'd like a process where you upgrade the weapon off the expansions Trials, Deep Dungeon, Treasure Map Dungeon, 24 man Raid, Normal mode Raid, etc. Something that says "Here's all the content we've added, go do it".

Like I said before, not everything is going to fit my idea of fun, which is why I like seeing separation in the game's content. If a task pushes me too far outside of what I like doing it starts to feel more like a chore. On the other hand though, I'd benefit from having people who don't mind the grind running content I do like. As I don't really chase relics in the first place your idea isn't something that would negatively impact my enjoyment of the game. However if I did decide to go after a relic weapon, I wouldn't want to deal with an overly long to do list in getting it. I wouldn't want to do literally everything, but depending on what the list was I might enjoy the process.

[Nalien]

Generally, I would agree to having different gears be useful for different content. Unfortunately, as a tradeoff for being able to play as all the jobs in one character, our inventory system is a weak point and having to keep different gears for different contents might not be a good thing.

I feel the Materia system can offer an ideal solution to that. All they need to do is give it a 100% chance to meld and a 100% chance to be retrieved (actually, on the subject of melding... "Increased Meld success rate" would be one hell of a stat, we actually have something similar for Desynthesis already...), then it's a trade off of what? Some minimal Direct Hit loss? Makes melding a bit more of an active process, rather than the meld and forget process we currently have. Slap on a Treasure Hunter stat before doing some more casual content (where, lets be honest, the additional combat stats don't matter in the slightest), take it off and put back Crit or whatever before raiding where Treasure Hunter has no real purpose. Arguably that's a negative, since you'd be using up more combat materia re-melding, but from a market perspective I'd say that's actually a positive?

For a Relic though, I'd say just make it the ultimate weapon for that expansion, with all the special stats... A branching upgrade process where you pick what content branches you want to complete. Don't Raid? Well your Relic never reaches the highest item level. You do Trials? You upgrade the Relic with Trial specific stats, also do Treasure Maps? You upgrade it with Treasure Hunter or something. You get out exactly what you put in, and you can end up with a weapon that's truly deserving of all the fanfare a Relic weapon should have.

People complain about hunts and fates being zerg fests. What makes you think any meaningful content in the open world would be any different?

Simple, all SE needs to do is revive Combat Levequests. Honestly Hunts should be special "endgame" Levequests to begin with... Done. Now the Hunt spawns because you did the Levequest for it, and the Hunt that spawns is claimed by your party and your party alone. The entire server (or datacenter now, I guess) does not, and cannot, swoop in to help you kill it. Slap in a progression system; Do the B Rank Levequest, get item for the A Rank, and so on. Make it so you can't just spam them. Now its a system you can log in and do with your friends, rather than having a schedule dictated to you by Hunt LSs.

Honestly, if I could make one change to fix Eureka, it would have been just that. Change the FATEs to Levequests. Same deal with Hunts, same deal with almost any open world content... World bosses should be a rare exception, not the bleedin norm...

Like I said before, not everything is going to fit my idea of fun, which is why I like seeing separation in the game's content. If a task pushes me too far outside of what I like doing it starts to feel more like a chore. On the other hand though, I'd benefit from having people who don't mind the grind running content I do like. As I don't really chase relics in the first place your idea isn't something that would negatively impact my enjoyment of the game. However if I did decide to go after a relic weapon, I wouldn't want to deal with an overly long to do list in getting it. I wouldn't want to do literally everything, but depending on what the list was I might enjoy the process.

This is why I like the idea of a branching Relic quest, one where you fill out the branches you're interested in. It would have branches for almost every piece of content in the game, but none of them would be a requirement, just a case of "You obtained the Trial weapons, so you can boost your Relic with them", with that particular boost being specific to Trials (maybe it has an extra Totem drop for you, helping you grind additional Trial weapons and/or the Mounts, for example). If you do everything though, then it truly is the ultimate weapon. It would have stats for every piece of content in that expansion, be a relevant weapon for all of them. If you don't like Deep Dungeons though? Well you'd have no need for the effect adding a Deep Dungeon weapon to the Relic would provide, so there's no problem, right? All those content relevant stats could be on their respective weapons, for example. Someone who only Raids gets the Raid weapon, they don't need to merge it with other weapons via the Relic because they don't care about that other content.

Arguably the existing Relics did already achieve "best weapon" status. They eventually reach bootleg Raid weapon item level, and have additional substats to boot, making them by far the best weapons. It's just... That's so boring... There is nothing exciting about seeing high levels of Crit on a Relic weapon for me... I'd be much more excited by stats like "Treasure Hunter" that do something different. If it elicited any response from me, it's the same response as upgrading any piece of equipment, upgrading a weapon from i440 to i450 is the same as upgrading from i450 to i460 in my mind, and Relics have always done the exact same thing... There's nothing different or exciting about them, which I think a Relic type weapon should have... They should be special for more than just their glamour glow.

[Barraind]

But XI was more based around 'Certain races are better at certain classes' from what I remember. Racial bonuses are negligible here.

Unless they give you more than just passive stat increases (and it has to be either a very good active ability or game-breaking passive), racial bonuses are usually only relevant for a couple years at most in any MMO. As soon as mudflation hits, minor stat bonuses are worthless.

Examples of this are dwarf priests in WoW having fear break or undead being passively immune to certain CC (game-breakingly good and caused the entire system to get re-balanced) vs Troll regeneration in EQ (stopped being relevant less than 10% into the games lifespan)

[linay]

...

I'm kind of liking these ideas, but of course it depends on actual implementation. Some things are actually not as good when implemented as when thought of on paper.

Unless they give you more than just passive stat increases (and it has to be either a very good active ability or game-breaking passive), racial bonuses are usually only relevant for a couple years at most in any MMO. As soon as mudflation hits, minor stat bonuses are worthless.

Examples of this are dwarf priests in WoW having fear break or undead being passively immune to certain CC (game-breakingly good and caused the entire system to get re-balanced) vs Troll regeneration in EQ (stopped being relevant less than 10% into the games lifespan)

I hope FFXIV never have racial abilities. I like race to be purely cosmetic.

[Nalien]

I'm kind of liking these ideas, but of course it depends on actual implementation. Some things are actually not as good when implemented as when thought of on paper.

Eureka is a prime example of that I feel, so I'll just defer to my original statement;

Instead of a Merit System I think I'd prefer a more robust Relic Weapons system, but Lord knows SE will never be able to deliver on that...

It's fun brainstorming concepts though, even if SE will never even see these posts, much less be able to implement them in any meaningful way.

[RoyalBeef]

So instead you'd have people who would unsub when they find things like grind out merits to be busywork.

So you're saying people would rather stay subbed when there's nothing to do than stay subbed when they're given something to do? /doubt
And yeah, MMOs consist of busywork. That's the only thing that keeps them afloat. Aside from beasttribes etc, even the MSQ quests contain busywork. So people grind out beattribes for some silly mount, and go through extreme lengths to farm glamour sets, but make them complete the same busywork for actual improvement of their character, suddenly they start whining about it being a bad thing. You're doing stuff anyway, and you rather have that exp go to waste instead of being able to use it for character improvement? Doesn't make any sense.

For the players who don't engage in endgame content those perks wouldn't bee needed anyway, so they could completely opt out of getting them, so nothing would change for them.

[Zarabeth]

I'd definitely vote no on this.

[Rasikko]

Idea: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/forums/71