scholar fairy

[Savagelf]

can we glamour Pixie for are fairy

[YusiKha]

can we glamour Pixie for are fairy

no
/10char

[Kurando]

No.

But maybe we can get some mini-seraph glamours, I could live with that.

[NobleWinter]

At one point Eos and Selene looked different because they were different aspects of Lily. Now they do the exact same thing so I don't see why Lily can't have more useless color variations and maybe for lore reasons say they represent different emotions she's feeling or something to that effect. We should honestly only have one summon spell too that just rotates between our fairies as well. It's just wasted hot bar space.

[Brandedblade]

Fortunately for you, you arent obligated to bind both of them to your hot bar so pick the one you like and bind that one.

[Billythepancake]

I don't understand why Summon EOS/Selene is even an action anymore. They're the same fairy, there's no benefit to not having it out, it can't die, why is the fairy not out whenever I swap to SCH with a text command to change the glamour? Just cut out the middle man at this point, since they don't want to put in the work and actually give us diverse summons. (But I guess SMN gets to keep all 3 of theirs, even the ones that are clearly less useful than the others.)

[Jx00x]

I don't understand why Summon EOS/Selene is even an action anymore. They're the same fairy, there's no benefit to not having it out, it can't die, why is the fairy not out whenever I swap to SCH with a text command to change the glamour? Just cut out the middle man at this point, since they don't want to put in the work and actually give us diverse summons. (But I guess SMN gets to keep all 3 of theirs, even the ones that are clearly less useful than the others.)

Totally agree with this. It was the same with Protect. At no time will a SCH not have a fairy present and therefore it's just an unnecessary spell.

[kobe-sabi]

to tell you the truth i would take recoloring with more special colors over glam, especially if we could recolor in three parts, lighting effects, body, and accents. SE recolor enemies, so it shouldnt be hard for our pets that means SMN too, this could help people on making their pets unique from others.

[Eloah]

But maybe we can get some mini-seraph glamours, I could live with that.

I doubt this would happen. If you pay attention to the Seraph model she is bare bones at best, with the glow effect used to mask all of the little features that would normally be there but aren't. Basically she isnt a full model like Lily, she's a pre-model, I guess is what you'd call it.

I wouldn't mind recolors with hair variations. I've notice now that Lily is fully one entity, I see more people with Selene out over Eos. Either Selene was always like more for how she looked, or people got board of seeing Eis everytime, lol

[CrimsonGunner]

I don't understand why Summon EOS/Selene is even an action anymore. They're the same fairy, there's no benefit to not having it out, it can't die, why is the fairy not out whenever I swap to SCH with a text command to change the glamour? Just cut out the middle man at this point, since they don't want to put in the work and actually give us diverse summons. (But I guess SMN gets to keep all 3 of theirs, even the ones that are clearly less useful than the others.)

they dont want diverse summons to both SCH and SMN, its clearly shown by the lack of proper job treatment both are getting.
not only with the lack of more egi glamours to SMN but SMN egis are in-fact a re-skin carbuncle, the glamour system is only there for us to be able to change them from egi to carbuncle and nothing else.
also your right about the fairy, they might as well be a glamour and leave one button.
on that note ,are you really sure you want SE to hear "make eos/selene get the egi glamour treatment" ? i mean its a pretty bad system if SE will do it ,it might turn to be even worse then having 2 button to summon. with SE treatment SCH might be like tataru, they summons lily only for her to run away XD .