Quote Originally Posted by Samsta View Post
It's actually you who are doing this, first of all, the difference between astro's raiddps and whm's raiddps is usually higher than merely 400 rdps, you picked one battle where this is the case on most percentages, but if you look at the other current savage raids here are the differences on 75%:

[...]

And this is actually one of the better percentage to observe, at lower percentages the difference tends to grow higher.

This is not extremely small, whm basically deals 10% more rdps constantly by just having extremely high personal damage, there is no need for that, astro could definitely use a buff.
I explicitly stated it's from Titan statistics. If it wasn't clear from the tone in my post, I disagree that 0.5% is an extremely small difference and I posted an example of 0.5% which he would agree is not a small difference. The entire point of the post is that "0.5%" is not extremely small and that using cards well vs using cards poorly makes a significant difference.

Quote Originally Posted by Samsta View Post
Second of all, divination is not the strongest raid-wide buff, technical step has the same cd, but instead of 6% it buffs the damage by 5% and lasts 20 seconds instead of 15 seconds. The buff lasting 15 seconds and giving 6% more damage is actually less damage than buff lasting 20 seconds and giving 5% more damage, one could also make a case for embolden for physical heavy team, though this doesn't benefit the healers and I am not doing that math. And I know you said buffs so trick attack isn't included in that but it's basically the same thing as a buff, just in form of bebuff on enemy and it's the best raidwide damage ability in the game hands down.

Divination is strong, but it's not the best, and it definitely deserves to be stronger.
Fair enough. I forgot DNC existed. The math isn't as simple as that because it also depends on what you stack it with. But I don't really care to compare because of obvious reasons (you don't compare across roles).

My point is/was that 0.5% is not an extremely small difference, which you seem to agree with.