Eureka wasn't so bad, but endgame in ffxiv is lacking without eureka

[yukiiyuki]

It isn't true that I decide what end game means to me? You need to think about what you just typed.

End game = content that you do on max lvl. Most games consider "content" as PVE or PVP battles.
Someone can dance in Limsa and think that this is real Endgame, but its like telling people that blue color is not blue. but green, its your opinion, but it dont change the fact.

[Reap00]

End game = content that you do on max lvl. Most games consider "content" as PVE or PVP battles.
Someone can dance in Limsa and think that this is real Endgame, but its like telling people that blue color is not blue. but green, its your opinion, but it dont change the fact.

That is your opinion. You will never change my opinion. I don't define it that way and I never will.

[Lambdafish]

That is your opinion. You will never change my opinion. I don't define it that way and I never will.

You must be fun at parties. You might as well have said "Alexander is the current raid because I'm doing it minimum ilvl and its more relevant than Eden". You aren't wrong in your thinking that you can choose how to spend your time within the game, but thats not the same as defining the "endgame". The endgame is specific pieces of content designed to be the players next step once they reach the postgame. lvl 80 dungeons, lvl 80 raids, lvl 80 24 mans and content like eureka are all specifically endgame because the chronology that they fit into is exclusively post-game. Of those, we currently only have 3 dungeons and a raid cycle. That is where the complaints lie. Thats not an opinion, you are mixing up "endgame" and "available content at max level".

[yukiiyuki]

That is your opinion. You will never change my opinion. I don't define it that way and I never will.

What a mad lad, fighting against common logic just do be irregular and special. Cheers.