Maybe RDM need....

[cactuarzzzz]

You get to use it twice in E3S and thrice in E4S. If we want to talk Ultimates, you get to use it even more frequently during transitions. But you’re wanting to remove it based on the single, full-uptime fight in this entire tier? Why are you not considering the other three in your suggestion? There’s no reason to lock it out in general, but you’re trying to apply an exception as support for your proposition, rather than looking at the norm (which would be the other fights where you get usages from the skill).

It's not a proper way to use healing spell. I don't get why you guy're so upset.
5.1 is coming and RDM's buff/change is expected so you can ask for alt way or suggest a better changes but instead of asking for a proper/alt way you're so mad at me for trying to take the way to exploit that rely on transition from you?.The battle stance I suggest could be a lv.72+ skill so you can kept using the expoilt in ultimate but why do you have to be so quick to judge me? You could even suggest that when enter the stance in the beginning it give RDM's insta cast + free blk+wht mana but all I hear is how people upset with me, what the?

If instead of stance you get 10 sec personal dps boost would you rather using healing in that window instead of the attack skill? unless you want to reduce your dps? I've said this before that the stance doesn't have to be perma but if you want to deal better damage all time+have emboden improvement and able to use verrise/heal all the time it could bring us to another problem down below.

[I hope I don't have to repeat it again but] if after the changes RDM is being mobile+doing good damage + bring good dps utility + able to use verrise/heal at whim then is there a reason to bring Bard/Mechanist/Summoner? If RDM getting a buff and turn to be that great class it would feel nice to me too but it wouldn't be me who you need to convince, It is the classes that loss their place to you, especially when 1 spot is likely get permenantly claimed by the BLM.