Results -9 to 0 of 117

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Akiudo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    514
    Character
    Narumi Akiudo
    World
    Alpha
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Wayfinder3 View Post
    the only reason why this isn't saying anything is because, Melee don't offer much more than ranged do as far as utility. the Role is just better than every other role with the exception of BLM. if ranged were swapped with melee, it would be BLM, 2 of DNC/BRD/MCH, and the last would be the strongest melee or a 3rd ranged. Melee are assured 2 slots because they're just better than the other alternatives right now by at least 8% to 10% rdps
    thats basically my point, i was simply pointing out that this is a reason why using the role bonus is a bad justification, like i don't say the role bonus is a bad thing, its their to encourage some balance and obviously not all classes will be perfectly balanced ever, its just that at least some people argue that the role bonus is a good fix to imbalance in a "if they are only 6% worse than role bonus will fix it" way, which is not really true, thats the point where the role bonus is enough to "enforce" 1 phys ranged/1caster, but not nearly the point where this blatant imbalance disappers.

    If all casters/ranged where 5% below the lowest melee the role bonus would work in the "take one of these" sense, it would however not make things like double physical ranged any more viable which while i don't think is necessarely "bad" i really don't see a reason why 2/1/1 melee/phys/ranged should be encouraged more than 1/2/1 or maybe even 2/2 for example (that would require combining the caster/ranged phys bonus but i personally wouldn't mind that, its basically the same slot at this point anyways)
    (0)
    Last edited by Akiudo; 09-01-2019 at 06:20 AM.