Quote Originally Posted by Dogempire View Post
So let me get this straight.

You think that people who can't even maintain a proper rotation are a perfectly viable metric for job balance, and that it would be perfectly viable to choose which jobs need buffs and nerfs based off of the most incompetent players? Because that's the point you seem to be making and defending.
It's called "not looking at a single data set on which to base my assumptions". There are as many intricacies as there are generalizations, and the intricacies are what I've repeatedly brought up my posts because for the most part people seem to only want to cling to a generalization or 2 and throw the rest out.