Monk should it be "Nerfed" ?

[Sora_Oathkeeper]

According to SSS MNK is meant to be above SAM. As it always had a higher dps requirement, evem DRG did iirc. So it being unintentionally high doesn't fit with what was already established. Even before MNK buffs. Nonetheless that's not to say that SAM should be below MNK in pDPS.

I fully agree with what Rakeesh said; at this point nerfing jobs does nothing except hinder groups that are using said jobs.

Furthermore the raid has been cleared in min ilvl so it's not like a power creep would have any impact on this raiding tier as it's been done and cleared day 1. Any future content should be balanced around buffs. What we don't want to see though is 2 similar jobs being buffed back and forth until they are so OP and destroy the competition (mch, brd in HW). I think the devs will have learned their lesson on that one though.

[Metalwrath]

According to SSS MNK is meant to be above SAM. As it always had a higher dps requirement, evem DRG did iirc. So it being unintentionally high doesn't fit with what was already established. Even before MNK buffs. Nonetheless that's not to say that SAM should be below MNK in pDPS.

The problem right now is that monk has a much lower dps requirement than it used to.It's quite easy to keep up gl and with pb,low true north cd and the new riddle of earth you dont even need to hit positionals most of the time.If anything its probably now the lowest skill ceiling of all the melee dps.
SE didnt listen to the long time monk players and instead interpreted it as *doing positionals is too hard* so they gave monk extra ways to avoid useing postionals on top of boosting the damage to make up for having to do positionals.doing both things contradicts itself.It should have been one or the other and not both.