healers have always had high damage spells in FF games like holy which has been nerfed so many times now, I would rather have high damage holy which is costly instead of this current low damage low cost holy.
healers have always had high damage spells in FF games like holy which has been nerfed so many times now, I would rather have high damage holy which is costly instead of this current low damage low cost holy.
Traditionally, Final Fantasy White Mages have always had one super nuke that was on par, if not stronger, than their Black Mage counterparts. But it was just that: one. One spell. Compared to the arsenal that Black Mage has.So i had this on my mind for a while now and wanted to just put it out there to see what others think. Why does a WHM(A Healer)...let me clarify that again "A Healer" have a 900 potency spell while BLM(A DPS) has only 750? It just irks me why a healer would have a higher potency magic spell than a black mage. Afflatus Misery should be changed to 1 blood lily petal to cast but potency should be like 350. Xenoglossy should be atleast 800. I play both but it's just i don't understand why a healer has a higher spell potency than a DPS.
/end
Furthermore, White Mages tend to have higher Magic Power than Black Mages. Case in point: FFX, Yuna was stronger than Lulu when it came to raw magic power.
Totally agreed. Holy is supposed to be the White Mage’s ultimate offensive ability. It’s something that should be built up to and not spammed on trash.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.