Quote Originally Posted by Seku View Post
Cid is a swordsaint and Gafgarion "dark knight" later was translated into Fellknight. Obviously so that SE could make the difference. They also both happen to be NPC's that you don't keep in your party. Also, in the IV remake, darkness takes 10% of your health to double your attack for 3 turns. So...yeah it does take damage to increase damage.

Any how, I'm done arguing with you as you've not brought any counter argument or real counter evidence to prove your point - which is that Dark Knight is "tanky".
Hmm i didn't know that you couldn't keep Cid take his Excalibur then bench him. But yeah i must have played another version of Tactics that you didn't.

I have proved exactly what i have stated there's 4 main title Dark Knights all use heavy armor all use swords all fight in the front lines all have high HP only 2 of them have ever used hp to do damage XI's DRK and DRK Cecil. The latters who's skill was so weak his normal attacks hit harder. And im not referring to the DS remake either.

Everyone has it in their head that DRK has "always sacrificed hp to do more damage" in every game when this is not even close to truth. Get over it XIV DRK isn't ds Cecil and xi drk. Its a tank and the job story actually tells you why they call themselves Dark Knights.