Excuse me? Not again?
I shouldnt offer advice to how to fix the housing situation?
Square-Enix shouldnt acknowledge the grave mistake they have made, and address the issue?
People who are using bots to claim houses should be rewarded while actual players, not breaking the Terms of Service, by using bots, who have been subscribed longer, arent able to get one?
If you think this is acceptable, even when Yoshida himself said FC and personal housing would not be shared, nor would it be tied to your subscription, and then the system encourages bot spamming.. sure nothing anyone says is going to change your mind, but logical thinking dictates this system needs to be addressed.
I'm sure more people quit the game over housing, than "the ARR quest line is too long."
Housing **should** be addressed before them changing or "condensing" the 2.0 quest line.
Edit
Ok, just because there are countless threads, you should go to all of them and tell them to stop?
There wouldnt be so many, if Square-Enix addressed the issue, instead of turning their attention to less important "problems."
Why the opposition, how about Square-Enix do something instead of wasting time on things that bare little to no consequence to player enjoyment? ... such as "condensing ARR quest line" or "reworking AST/DRK" or "reworking crafting/gathering" all of this was not asked for. But housing was. They need to get their focus back and address the actual issues. If you dont agree, sure, go to every thread telling people to stop trying to direct Sqaure-Enix to the important issues. Thats what the forums has become anyway.
All the suggestions I have read, do not add a gil cap, or doesnt add chance to winning based on more effort. The ones I read, also dont include a reward system for having lost the house that prevents encouraging RMT.
**********Most importantly, my thread includes Alternate character housing sharing, which is, again, a huge issue in the game. The people who have entire districts, are people with alts. Again, if alt automatic sharing was added at the start, which it should have been, half the problems wouldnt be nearly as severe.


			
					
					
					
						
  Reply With Quote

