Cause of ascian calamity and rejoining elemental

[Thanapat]

1.what is cause of ascian civilzation calamity that nearly break world
Apart that make ascian created zodiark

Natural disaster meteor? Or fail experimental breakout

2.13 shard + 1 main world
What is 13 elemental of rejoining that not yet reveal

1.fire
2.water
3.wind
4.earth
5.lighting
6.ice
7.non-elemental bahamut
8.Light (nearly succeed in 1st shard but fail because champion and
Scion of seventh dawn and zenos)
9.Dark (fail to munch darkness in 13th shard)
10.?
11.?
12.?
13.?

What 4 elemental of yet reveal

[MrThinker]

1.what is cause of ascian civilzation calamity that nearly break world
Apart that make ascian created zodiark

Natural disaster meteor? Or fail experimental breakout

2.13 shard + 1 main world
What is 13 elemental of rejoining that not yet reveal

1.fire
2.water
3.wind
4.earth
5.lighting
6.ice
7.non-elemental bahamut
8.Light (nearly succeed in 1st shard but fail because champion and
Scion of seventh dawn and zenos)
9.Dark (fail to munch darkness in 13th shard)
10.?
11.?
12.?
13.?

What 4 elemental of yet reveal

Just a correction, it is revealed that Bahamut was a Darkness-aligned calamity. Yes, the 13th may have been a failed attempt to cause a darkness calamity, but they succeeded with Bahamut.

[dragoelete]

Just a correction, it is revealed that Bahamut was a Darkness-aligned calamity. Yes, the 13th may have been a failed attempt to cause a darkness calamity, but they succeeded with Bahamut.

if you can tell me where thats revealed (and dont say the exarchs presentation cause he didnt say it was a darkness calamity. he showed it as a red black world which in a lot of games is the color of the nuetral element.) then cool if not im still saying people who say the 7th was a darkness rejoining are full of it.

[Anonymoose]

1.what is cause of ascian civilzation calamity that nearly break world

We have no idea! All we know is that there was a "sound" and the "laws of nature" were unmade and the Ancients lost control of their creation magicks.

What is 13 elemental of rejoining that not yet reveal

If I remember the cutscene correctly:

[0] The Thirteenth is destroyed when Igeyorhm accidentally triggers a Flood of Darkness (no element)
[1] The Fifth was Rejoined in a Wind Calamity
[2] The Twelfth was Rejoined in a Lightning Calamity
[3] The Second was Rejoined in a Fire Calamity
[4] The Third was Rejoined in an Earth Calamity
[5] The Sixth was Rejoined in an Ice Calamity
[6] The Tenth was Rejoined in a Water Calamity
[7] The Seventh was Rejoined in a Calamity of all elements tilted towards the astral charge (by Darkness)

In Shadowbringers, we learn that the First was almost Rejoined in a Calamity of all elements tilted towards the umbral charge (by Light).

What will come next (if anything) is unknown. We have gone all the way around the Elemental Wheel and both polarities, so in theory we are done. Why did history follow this very familiar pattern? We don't know! Elidibus seems dedicated to killing the Warrior of Light before he tries any more plans. If we put a stop to him first, we may never see another!

if you can tell me where thats revealed

They probably got the info from a combination of Lore Book 1 (which reveals that Bahamut's calamity was "all elements charged astrally") and Urianger's 5.0 presentation (which revealed that Light is behind the passive charge, what Eorzea would call umbral, ergo Bahamut's calamity - the active astral charge - was elements skewed by the effect of Darkness). In the Exarch's presentation, this Calamity was a color I can only describe as "evil dragonfruit", but it fits, lol.

[dynus]

If I remember the cutscene correctly:

[0] The Thirteenth is destroyed when Igeyorhm accidentally triggers a Flood of Darkness (no element)
[1] The Fifth was Rejoined in a Wind Calamity
[2] The Twelfth was Rejoined in a Lightning Calamity
[3] The Second was Rejoined in a Fire Calamity
[4] The Third was Rejoined in an Earth Calamity
[5] The Sixth was Rejoined in an Ice Calamity
[6] The Tenth was Rejoined in a Water Calamity
[7] The Seventh was Rejoined in a Calamity of all elements tilted towards the astral charge (by Darkness).

I'll have to double-check myself, but I'm pretty sure was the Seventh that was rejoined in the Ice Calamity and the Eighth for the Astral Aspected/Bahamut one.

[MrThinker]

They probably got the info from a combination of Lore Book 1 (which reveals that Bahamut's calamity was "all elements charged astrally") and Urianger's 5.0 presentation (which revealed that Light is behind the passive charge, what Eorzea would call umbral, ergo Bahamut's calamity - the active astral charge - was elements skewed by the effect of Darkness). In the Exarch's presentation, this Calamity was a color I can only describe as "evil dragonfruit", but it fits, lol.

Yes that's exactly it Moose, lol.

[Sylvain]

Just wondering, for all the rejoining with a specific element, were those element tilted toward ulbral/ Astral or balanced?
And also, do they have to be different? I dont see why they couldn't cause 2 water calamity

[Ventura_Highway]

Just wondering, for all the rejoining with a specific element, were those element tilted toward ulbral/ Astral or balanced?
And also, do they have to be different? I dont see why they couldn't cause 2 water calamity

I think they could theoretically but it would be harder. If they need to cause 13 rejoinings they'd have to.

If I remember G'raha's lecture right aether is sort of like a gas in that it likes to go from places of higher concentration to places of lower concentration, calamities from an aetheric perspective involve a shard's aether totally flooding into the source. So, if we have a water calamity than ends with say, Shard 10's largely water-aspected aether being totally relocated onto the source, wouldn't it be hard to usher in a consecutive water-aspected calamity?

[MrThinker]

I'll have to double-check myself, but I'm pretty sure was the Seventh that was rejoined in the Ice Calamity and the Eighth for the Astral Aspected/Bahamut one.

Remember that going by the assumption that the shards are indeed in order going clockwise from the Source (which indeed seems to be the case since we know the First and 13th are clockwise and anticlockwise to either side of it), the 7th would be directly opposite of the Source itself.

[dynus]

In most cases, yes, but the Source was always represented by a larger sphere than the rest, which offsets it a tad. I drew a diagram and marked them off as I watched the cut scene after Emet showed us which one the 13th was. As I said, I'll have to double-check when I log on and rewatch the scenes.