Quote Originally Posted by Archwizard View Post
/snip
Lets me get this straight:
You say it's better to address the argument (which is defined by considering an argument Respectfully, Fairly, Objectively, Accurately) and give me a personal jibe in the same sentence?

Then you point out that elemental damage-type is purely cosmetic but can't get over the point that Fleche and Contre Sixte are unaspected? It already been explained to you that the damage type was piercing so it would synergize with piercing debuff when those debuff were a thing.

Finally, when you say that animation is not a valid proof, it's sound debate. but when you get served that exact same argument it's no longer "addressing the argument"?