Wars in need if potency increases

[Schrute]

Comparing average potency makes absolute sense when you're specifically complaining about Inner Beasts potency. This has nothing to do with their numbers overall; you said IB potency doesn't make sense because 350 is lower than 380, and I explained to you why you don't understand comparing average potency to 1 GCD.

Inner Beast a DPS increase. Fact. Fullstop.

Now whether or not they need buffs elsewhere isn't something I particularly care about, I was just addressing one point you made so you have better context on balance, because if you don't know how to compare average potencies then you probably should get a handle on that first before throwing your opinion out there.

Never said inner beast was a dps loss. It’s not the dps gain it used to be all around. It is the only thing they can buff to be a dps gain at lvl 50 cap. There is no oGCD or combo potencies they can increase. I mean they could increase eye/path but that translates into the 50 above content.

Again they need to increase warrior potencies

[shao32]

Never said inner beast was a dps loss. It’s not the dps gain it used to be all around. It is the only thing they can buff to be a dps gain at lvl 50 cap. There is no oGCD or combo potencies they can increase. I mean they could increase eye/path but that translates into the 50 above content.

Again they need to increase warrior potencies

inner beast is a dps gain, it's irrelevant if the gain was higher in the past, that content doesn't matter today and use inner beast is better that don't use it.

[Schrute]

It’s is relevant, don’t kid yourself that nerfs aren’t relevant. Minimal dps gain is a valid concern.

Anyways, back to 2019, hi, wars need potency increases

[WhyAmIHere]

It’s is relevant, don’t kid yourself that nerfs aren’t relevant. Minimal dps gain is a valid concern.

Anyways, back to 2019, hi, wars need potency increases

must be hard to hear with all that cotton in your ear.

WAR is fine. Old content that isn't Ultimate isn't concerned when balance talks come up.

[Reynhart]

It’s is relevant, don’t kid yourself that nerfs aren’t relevant. Minimal dps gain is a valid concern.

Ok, I know we shouldn't stereotype people that are concerned with WAR, but you're here literally calling a "not enough increase" a nerf.

[shao32]

It’s is relevant, don’t kid yourself that nerfs aren’t relevant. Minimal dps gain is a valid concern.

Anyways, back to 2019, hi, wars need potency increases

Nerfs? I don't think you know the meaning of that word, WAR dps performance is on par of the other tanks, minimal dps gain of 1 skill doesn't matter if the whole kit archive a appropriate performance and WAR kit do it already.

If you complaint about WAR performance at lvl 50 at least bring a resume of all tanks at that level and see if WAR is really underperforming in that irrelevant content that nobody do sync compared to his comrades.