In that case, why are there Padjal/Kinna weapons, but no Alexandrian? The latter would've been preferred since those were the highest ilvl available at 60.I think this is likely because the jobs don't ever touch the levels prior to 60 since they start at 60. SAM/RDM prob got them because they had started at 50 it was relevant to their gear, not glamour. That is just my theory. So since they start at 60 the won't get any gear pre-60.
I had the same theory as you, but then that particular question I posed camed to mind.




The problem with this is that there's no weapons for Thordan, Ravana, Bismark or the rest of the HW primals...I think this is likely because the jobs don't ever touch the levels prior to 60 since they start at 60. SAM/RDM prob got them because they had started at 50 it was relevant to their gear, not glamour. That is just my theory. So since they start at 60 the won't get any gear pre-60.
We don't even have sb itemsI think this is likely because the jobs don't ever touch the levels prior to 60 since they start at 60. SAM/RDM prob got them because they had started at 50 it was relevant to their gear, not glamour. That is just my theory. So since they start at 60 the won't get any gear pre-60.

kinda glad they didn't release any....yet, some of the mats literally doubled the week before the early access now a "few" of them have dropped back down to sane price levels
(so now I can continuously horde em more until they do)
Last edited by Gariored; 07-03-2019 at 02:04 AM.

I'd probably buy that because it does seem like the logical thing but if that was the case, then where is all the primal weapons from SB? They don't even have thoseI think this is likely because the jobs don't ever touch the levels prior to 60 since they start at 60. SAM/RDM prob got them because they had started at 50 it was relevant to their gear, not glamour. That is just my theory. So since they start at 60 the won't get any gear pre-60.
I'm hoping that this is a backburner thing and might be added in later because both jobs are lacking in some significant glamour
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote
)


