What is this class design of Dancer?

[Gihwezi]

Yes it's a proc-based job, sure, but that's my niche, that's what I'm good at, and this job plays nowhere near the same way as mch (did, I'm assuming? since old mch is dead and all...). Anyway, Dancer is really fluid, seems like it's something really easy to pick up, and as of right now it hits like a fourteen wheeler truck.

Like JediFirefly said, no one's holding a gun up to your head forcing you to play it. :x

[Millybonk]

Yes it's a proc-based job, sure, but that's my niche, that's what I'm good at, and this job plays nowhere near the same way as mch (did, I'm assuming? since old mch is dead and all...). Anyway, Dancer is really fluid, seems like it's something really easy to pick up, and as of right now it hits like a fourteen wheeler truck.

Like JediFirefly said, no one's holding a gun up to your head forcing you to play it. :x

I'm really curious about upcoming parses of the class, because if you don't hit those 50% proc-chances for the majority of your abilities I reckon your damage output is quite laughable.
The previous MCH iteration also used the 50% proc-chance during your basic rotation to unlock the 2nd and 3rd ability(or rather to massively increase their potency), but now Dancer triples the abilities locked behind a 50% chance.

It is just me, or does both your "No one is forcing you to play it" really mean "Please don't voice your dissent on the forums".

[Gihwezi]

It is just me, or does both your "No one is forcing you to play it" really mean "Please don't voice your dissent on the forums".

No offense, and I mean this in the most respectful way possible, no disrespect at all but, man, nobody cares if you don't like Dancer or not, it's not that deep, go take a nap.

[Millybonk]

No offense, and I mean this in the most respectful way possible, no disrespect at all but, man, nobody cares if you don't like Dancer or not, it's not that deep, go take a nap.

1. You did respond to my post about the quite lacking Dancer mechanics when you just could've read it and not said anything, which means you indeed do care to some degree
2. You didn't falsify my points and rather claimed that 6 abilities locked behind a 50% chance is a "niche"
3. You're using a language which quite clearly shows you're getting emotional + you really don't want to hear a dissident dissect your beloved Dancer

[Hydrium]

3. You're using a language which quite clearly shows you're getting emotional + you really don't want to hear a dissident dissect your beloved Dancer

This is such a stale and terrible argument and has no basis in human psychology whatsoever.

You can find people contrarian and dim, tell them so and not raise your blood pressure a speck.

[Millybonk]

This is such a stale and terrible argument and has no basis in human psychology whatsoever.

You can find people contrarian and dim, tell them so and not raise your blood pressure a speck.

It doesn't?

Take a look at his posting history in this thread and you should notice the quick change of writing style between 2 posts from being content to "Nobody cares, take a nap".
You tell me if that quick change doesn't imply a quite visible change in getting emotionally invested.

[Gihwezi]

It doesn't?

Take a look at his posting history in this thread and you should notice the quick change of writing style between 2 posts from being content to "Nobody cares, take a nap".
You tell me if that quick change doesn't imply a quite visible change in getting emotionally invested.

Sir...I'm not sure how to tell you this, but I'm almost certain if you've been snooping through my post history, you'd have gleaned that I have several personality disorders and a screwy mood disorder. That you're really trying to find consistency in how I post is really funny, when nothing is consistent about me.

And, well, I'm actually quite confused. What does my consistency have to do with your opinion on Dancer, or did I miss something?

Trying to take a dig at my character is a pretty dick move... all because I like Dancer? Okay I guess. I still say you should nap.

Oh nevermind I read that wrong. It's 3 AM. WELL.... still... consistency who? I'm just a random lad man, I'm not even mad at you. More power to you if you don't like Dancer, dang, you trying extra hard to have an argument with me. :x

[Gihwezi]

1. You did respond to my post about the quite lacking Dancer mechanics when you just could've read it and not said anything, which means you indeed do care to some degree
2. You didn't falsify my points and rather claimed that 6 abilities locked behind a 50% chance is a "niche"
3. You're using a language which quite clearly shows you're getting emotional + you really don't want to hear a dissident dissect your beloved Dancer

I dunno man, you seem kinda cranky and bent out of shape, you on here arguing about a job that ain't even been out a day. 'Beloved Dancer'? Bruh we've only been playing this job for a day and some people just like what they see, like me. Again... it's not that deep? Idk what you want me to tell you ffff.

EDIT: Also I said it's my niche, not that it's niche... :T

Also I mained Bard, anyone who come into this thread screaming and crying about Dancer's proc system this, Dancer's proc system that, honestly, if you ain't heavily mess with 4.0 Bard I don't even want to hear about how bad Dancer's proc system to you is, goodbye.

[Shirosama]

No offense, and I mean this in the most respectful way possible, no disrespect at all but, man, nobody cares if you don't like Dancer or not, it's not that deep, go take a nap.

Dancer Main and I approve this message.

[Gralna]

It is just me, or does both your "No one is forcing you to play it" really mean "Please don't voice your dissent on the forums".

I took it as, "no one is forcing you to play it".