Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Wyssahtyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    870
    Character
    Saika Kinoshita
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Rogue Lv 53
    Quote Originally Posted by MistakeNot View Post
    Speak for yourself. Weapons should still be restricted - just because of how changing between classes/jobs work in FFXIV.

    Other than that it is just plain silliness for there to be any restrictions on gear glamours. AF gear not excepted.

    Of course, lifting restrictions on some gear is better than not lifting it on any.
    The person you quoted said that weapons should remain restricted. It's literally the second sentence, " Job-specific equipment (weapons and AF gear) should stay restricted."
    (6)

  2. #2
    Player
    Rongway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,192
    Character
    Cyrillo Rongway
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Wyssahtyn View Post
    The person you quoted said that weapons should remain restricted. It's literally the second sentence, " Job-specific equipment (weapons and AF gear) should stay restricted."
    MistakeNot isn't disagreeing with me about weapons, but about AF gear. And that's fine. Some people think all wearable gear (not weapons) should be unlocked. It's okay to have this opinion. It would be much more difficult to convince a dev to agree with this opinion, though. Arguing for role-free gear is a much more attainable goal, as the devs would be more likely to be swayed if we maintained that it's okay for AF gear to remain job locked.
    (0)
    Error 3102 Club, Order of the 52nd Hour

  3. #3
    Player
    Wyssahtyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    870
    Character
    Saika Kinoshita
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Rogue Lv 53
    Quote Originally Posted by Rongway View Post
    MistakeNot isn't disagreeing with me about weapons, but about AF gear. And that's fine. Some people think all wearable gear (not weapons) should be unlocked. It's okay to have this opinion. It would be much more difficult to convince a dev to agree with this opinion, though. Arguing for role-free gear is a much more attainable goal, as the devs would be more likely to be swayed if we maintained that it's okay for AF gear to remain job locked.
    Then they need to be clearer in the structure of their post because I had to scrutinise it for like five minutes to see how you arrived at your conclusion. Maybe by putting the part they're actually disagreeing with after the phrase signifying disagreement. "Speak for yourself, AF gear shouldn't be restricted" for instance, rather than "Speak for yourself, weapons should still be restricted. Line break. Oh, and AF gear shouldn't be restricted".
    (1)

Tags for this Thread