Redacted the thread
Redacted the thread
Last edited by Izanagi_Fiaresu; 06-13-2019 at 02:35 AM. Reason: Got my answer!
Final Fantasy has always had beef with blind faith and generally following an ideology without thinking about it.
Although the visual elements of the Sin Eaters take some inspiration of Christian, Islamic and Jewish religious figures...not one of them is actually a representation of said figures. For example those holy lions we fight are not the Lion of Judah, nor are they made out to be. The lore for 5.0 is not a commentary on anti-religion.
Last edited by SoloWingMetatron; 06-13-2019 at 02:09 AM.
Holiness, neither light does not represent Christianity.
Hydaelyn is not Jesus, nor she is Maria.
SE does not use Crucifix anywhere in their new story.
Also light could be interpreted by people of other religions as their own, in Islam God is literally light/sun and etc.
Light is not exclusive to Christianity.
In my perspective the trailer of the game does leave that question in open "become what you must" but doesn't mean you need to play a Warrior of Darkness after MSQ, those players with a backbone won't change their moral standards or religion just because of the MSQ worry nor it won't make a scratch.
You will only perceive in the character perspective it is not about your real life, or personal path much less about your religion but about the character's journey/evolution.
As far as I understood the MSQ is not about the Holiness, much less about Christianity or any variant but His Angels and those have no agenda but His.
But if you speak with someone that knows the madness of Solomon they will clarify you better about the trailer and this feels about it.
You saw the Angels painted in the wall the black, gray and white wings and the symbolism guess is self-explanatory.
Yet the problem is exactly what Anima said she isn't lying and they did terrible things over lies as excuses to their crimes.
If you have valid criticisms, then maybe you should consider how you phrase things, because from my perspective, your framing and dialogue isnt coming across as criticism but as vitriol and scorn. Particularly when you rely on the "Theyre powerful and do terrible things, therefore its super okay to dismiss the individuals concern or perspective on something." as justification.
It's not a criticism Anima is being factual even.
They are not different from criminals who should be the real persecuted.
Last edited by AnnaRosa; 06-14-2019 at 07:16 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.