I removed alot of the filler to address this. If anyone thinks I'm taking this out of context, they can read the original post.
So there's a couple of issues here. You say that this has nothing to do with your preferences (or that of your character's at least, in the case of deep RP). But it clearly does. Otherwise you would have never mentioned the lack of female attraction at all. I mean we can't really have an honest conversation now. It seems to be a way to say "well this is the majority way of doing things and its leaving the minorities out," while masquerading as a fear of loss of control.
Or worse, it is actually about the fear of loss of control, but the argument is made in a way to appeal to an entirely different group to aid in the argument. We need to identify which tactic you are using before going forward. And you're going to need to discard one. So which part are you going to recant? Is this discussion about Loss of Control, or about how hetereosexual attraction is used in game mechanics? Its 2019, you can be honest here. The majority isn't going to judge. Unless of course you're being dishonest in your presentation of your argument.
And right now this appears to be blatant dishonesty. However, I'm pretty sure most could overlook that if one of the positions is recanted. Or at least I'm willing to give it a second shot. What say you, OP? Which is it going to be?



Reply With Quote






