


And 4 per 2 GCD. Now we're talking Dot's. I thought I had terrible ping, but if you're only getting 2 spells off every 2 GCD, maybe you should look into a dot oriented job.
Edit: 3 per 2 it seems. Over time it would get incrementally more. This doesnt really change why we need to become more 3.0 DRG like than we already are - watching for verfire or verstone to proc, now we need to check out heavy thrust/disembowel too?
You might as well give the "depth and complexity" argument up. Look what happened to our friends, the Scholars this expansion
Im on the camp that giving a dot, cause everyone else has one or two dots, is just silly. Lets be RDM and not everyone else.
Last edited by ADVSS; 06-12-2019 at 01:23 PM.





No. It's two spells, two GCDs. The first spell happens at the end of the first GCD, the second spell happens at the beginning of the second GCD, then you can't cast another spell until the second GCD is over. Two spells, two GCDs.
RDM does not have, and never had, the ability to cast two spells in one GCD. Each spell takes up a whole GCD.
Error 3102 Club, Order of the 52nd Hour
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

