Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Player
    Delta_Reizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1
    Character
    Delta Reizon
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 70

    Regarding Timeworn Maps moving forward

    So I'm not sure how much of this has likely already been brought up for discussion, but with the Itinerant Moogle and the Tomestone Event places before Shadowbringers it does leave the question regarding the Maps that they are selling. As you get 2 maps for 50 Tomes, (Excessively expensive for the lack of duties that give the Tomes (same with amount earned from duties/cost for the items in my opinion)), is leads me to question on if they'll make the current Timeworn Maps stackable.

    Like, I understand they want people to work together for the maps, making it where it's a group effort and others can use their maps for the group, but making players have to go back and forth to a summing bell to grab another map off a retainer/go and gather another seems pretty silly at this point. Like, make the maps stackable that way it lessens the amount of time people have to deal with in traveling time and cost.

    However, as a means to still make it important for people to not just horde them, make it a small stackable count, maybe keep the daily obtainment on the maps when you are able to gather them, and/or make it where a map has a timer on it until it degrades into dust once it is in a player's inventory (obviously keep them able to be sold still, but the timer would be paused while being sold on the Market Board).

    That last one is debatable as it may be counter intuitive, but just throwing ideas out there.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player Doozer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eureka Orthos
    Posts
    2,007
    Character
    Gunnar Mel'nik
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 90
    To be fair, with maps you can get one, decipher it, then pick up another, put it in your saddlebag, and then have another undeciphered map in your inventory, for a total of three (3).
    (0)

  3. 06-08-2019 05:32 AM
    Reason
    lol didn't quite read the intent of OP's post. =p