Results 1 to 10 of 118

Hybrid View

  1. 05-30-2019 09:15 AM #1
    Jxnibbles
    Player
    Jxnibbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    304
    Character
    Aimori Duciel
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 80
    I mean from what is shown so far Whm seems okay.. Nothing more, Nothing less.

    I still firmly believe come 5.03 it will be the same story diffferent expansion. Both Astro/Sch will get crazy qol changes and we are just left in the dust to 6.0.

    If bloodlily gets looked at so it isn't dps neutral, and Fluid Aura is turned into a dps ability we can weave.. These two changes would at least make me feel like someone on the Dev team cares a tiny bit at least.
    (6)
    Last edited by Jxnibbles; 05-30-2019 at 09:33 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-30-2019 12:19 PM #2
    fantasticm
    Player
    fantasticm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    227
    Character
    Edda Eglantine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Botanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Jxnibbles View Post
    I still firmly believe come 5.03 it will be the same story diffferent expansion. Both Astro/Sch will get crazy qol changes and we are just left in the dust to 6.0.
    If I had the expendable income, I would ABSOLUTELY bet money on this happening. Unquestionably. I wouldn't even have to print this post out and hide it under my pillow for it to come true. It's going to happen. If it doesn't, I'm giving away most of my gil.

    Anyway. WHM just got more of the same, which is what nobody wanted but everyone expected. It's getting kind of sad at this point. I wonder what WHM mains of the future see, on the cusp of 6.0? At this point the safest hope would MAYBE be SE knocking the new lily skills off the GCD. It wouldn't be a god-tier buff but it would make Misery that much better. Presence of Mind AoE, or perhaps something that comes off PI? A distant dream... a sweet lie. But this could be the turning point where SE actually listens!
    (2)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »