Why was Living Dead not removed?

[TouchandFeel]

People just need to remember that healing enough to remove the "you will die" state also removes the "you cannot die" state since they are both part of Walking Dead and not separate.

So having a reduced healing requirement, like the often mentioned 50%, makes it easier to remove Walking Dead and less likely to die but also more easy for a healer to dispel it early and reduce the duration of the invulnerability.

Just food for thought.

[dragoelete]

People just need to remember that healing enough to remove the "you will die" state also removes the "you cannot die" state since they are both part of Walking Dead and not separate.

So having a reduced healing requirement, like the often mentioned 50%, makes it easier to remove Walking Dead and less likely to die but also more easy for a healer to dispel it early and reduce the duration of the invulnerability.

Just food for thought.

they could also make it where it doesnt end early if your healed ... just saying.

[TouchandFeel]

they could also make it where it doesnt end early if your healed ... just saying.

They could ... but that would require decoupling the effects into a buff (can't die) and a debuff (will die) with the healing only affecting the debuff, which would then also change the invuln part not dispelling.

So while doable it's not just as straight forward as "reduce the healing requirement". That was my point, to consider the ripple effects of what was being asked for so there is better context for weighing that versus other potential solutions.