Thread: Scholar 5.0 Discussion

Originally Posted by Foxkid

Otherwise, played a dungeon to level up to 71, my god was that just a pain in the ass to get through Sirensong Sea L I T E R A L L Y DOING NOTHING. Lustrate here, excog there, a couple succors, but the fairy takes care of most of it still unless the tank is doing a bigger pull.

I was in a dungeon and it's the first time since i play FF14 that i /followed a dps cause i was bored to cast 1 damn single dot on 5 diffrent targets + my dps was so weak, i was just wasting my time.

So i autofollowed someone and my fairy has done all the heal job and it worked.... next time i'll watch Lucifer while my toon will play alone. It's just pathetic.

logged in, seen this shit they changed on it, Logged out and haven't logged in ever since. They truly have no clue how to make good changes and seem to always fuck one job. This time it's scholar.

Scholar has mana issues but it isn't that bad. Why is everyone being so over dramatic? If they want to make us balanced they just need to lower the cost of our skills a tad and give us an aether dump. And Aetherflow outside of combat but I feel like that one they are gonna stand firm on to keep us from getting extra stacks in a fight.

Originally Posted by Freerider

Scholar has mana issues but it isn't that bad. Why is everyone being so over dramatic? If they want to make us balanced they just need to lower the cost of our skills a tad and give us an aether dump. And Aetherflow outside of combat but I feel like that one they are gonna stand firm on to keep us from getting extra stacks in a fight.

Because "MUH DEEPS" would be my guess. The changes to SCH are nowhere near as bad as people are making them out to be. My WHM friend is reporting the same with WHM, and my AST friend, while disappointed in the cards, says the job isn't that different from before.

Originally Posted by RyuDragnier

Because "MUH DEEPS" would be my guess. The changes to SCH are nowhere near as bad as people are making them out to be. My WHM friend is reporting the same with WHM, and my AST friend, while disappointed in the cards, says the job isn't that different from before.

Yeah, no. it's definitely not a question of "muh deps". and yes, sch's change are bad. really bad. a lot of peoples already explained why.

Heavensward Bard all over again. Guess I'm not playing Scholar for the next 2 years.

I tried to keep myself interested but I'm just going to stop at lv 74 on the MSQ and level Gunbreaker or something. At least that feels fun. They introduced QoL problems to SCH and AST (but they're at least addressing the queue problem on Play).

I'll use them for roulette fodder for crystals but that's it.

Originally Posted by Deceptus

Piety just sucks in general, it's Tenacity 2.0

Not enough to make any type of difference.

Wasn't Tenacity changed so it had some value? Or am I misremembering what I read?