Quote Originally Posted by Reinha View Post
Which is a choice. I don't know why it's so controversial to challenge that "the body will be covered most the time". If my Hrothgar is able to show the fur pattern most of the time, it's not a bug or a hack. It's... player preference.
Proof ? Hrothgar aren't even released yet with not testable means to show all types of armor on them. According to what we have now, yes the body will be covered most of the time. That is the design, unless you glamour the Emporer set / purposely choose some of the very few glamours where body markings/fur colour will show. If a feature causes you to restrict your clothing in order to 'feature' it, then it's a downside.

You are arguing that any modifications to the body, such as tattoos, scales, fur or chest hair, are all features with an inherent downside. I don't agree. It's up to the player's fashion preferences whether the placement of the feature is a downside or not.
No, don't misread the conversation. I said markings and body fur color are a downside because they will inherently be hidden, according to what current armor sets are available and how they are handled (which is usually fully covering the body).

I just want to point out that the default outfit for Hrothgar does not cover the fur.
The default here is when we put on some Omega gear, it's covering the entire body. Most armours by default cover the entire body. Most people are not going to go around wearing Hrothgar racial gear for the entirety of their gameplay.