Quote Originally Posted by whiskeybravo View Post
You seem to at least be an expert on taking quotes out of context.
Because 'Hahahahahaha' is so much to go on.

Quote Originally Posted by whiskeybravo View Post
Even though it wasn't my comment, Reproductive organs =/= Fertility. Why is the woman still a woman? Why is the man still a man? Because they still have the bodily parts to make them such, obviously. Furthermore, there are plenty of people who aren't fertile but have never had those procedures done. Very poor example on your part.
1. It's exactly what you meant, and you know it. Don't backtrack.
2. Body parts don't define it, either. If it were that convenient, transgender and intersex people simply wouldn't exist.
3. It's a perfect example. You just don't like it because it doesn't support your ignorance.

Quote Originally Posted by whiskeybravo View Post
Besides, you (and others) seem to be glossing over the fact that reproductive organs aren't the only thing that makes up gender. WhiteArchMage seems to trample on the idea that throughout history certain attributes have been associated with a particular gender. For example females being more creative and empathetic, males being more logical or prone to violence. What W.A.M fails to point out, in some ancient cultures it was considered ideal for a person to achieve a balance of aspects from both genders to be complete. Women embracing the attributes of men, men embracing the attributes of women to achieve a higher state of consciousness. I think the most historical information in this regard comes from ancient Egypt, but the concept is mimicked in some modern cultures a well. Whether these are truly in nature or whether they are formed by society is rather irrelevant - the fact remains that sexes do indeed exhibit different behavior within a fairly predictable pattern.
Not mentioning something because it wasn't even part of the discussion is a far cry from glossing over.

What you are discussing are socially ingrained gender roles; that is why you see an obvious pattern. There is, however, ultimately nothing biologically innate about any of those personality qualities whatsoever. A man can be soft and an excellent caregiver (single fathers), and a woman can be incredibly violent and sociopathic (one of the many female serial killers to exist throughout).

Quote Originally Posted by whiskeybravo View Post
A man wants to wear women's clothing, but what makes a particular piece of cloth suitable for a woman to wear to begin with? Your imagination?
It's subjective.

Quote Originally Posted by whiskeybravo View Post
It's true, we have much better technology in this day and age than ever before. Gender Dysphoria has likely been a medical condition since the beginning of time, but where we used to be able to do nothing about it - perhaps there are things we can do now. I still don't see any evidence what-so-ever that would remove this from being a medical condition. It is what it is, we all get dealt a different hand in life.
It's not a medical condition. Medical procedures can, however, help. There is a big difference.

Quote Originally Posted by Jin- View Post
Stop spreading your american gender politics bs here
It's always funny to read comments like this. OP just wanted more options. It was the naysayers that turned it into a political discussion.