



Nope. I do what I want.
And I don't see a dungeon that I've successfully main healed through my fairy to be worth an hour of my time.
The penalty for staying is greater than the penalty for withdrawing.
Last edited by van_arn; 05-05-2019 at 03:19 PM.





The one that bugs me is the expert roulette - I wish they'd take that one, add each new dungeon and simply have it award gear associated with the highest when queued for via that system... oh, and just make it limited 7 times a week rather than daily.
When the game's story becomes self-aware:


Stopped reading when I saw Seiryu in there because he isn't mandatory for MSQ progression.
The MSQ roulette is staying as it is for a while, along with the 2 dungeons staying in the Mentor Roulette. The rewards for clearing it and helping other progress through the story are rewards that many still don't want to pass up and take for granted.Just delete the roulette instead. It keeps mucking up my mentor roulette with a wasted 30 minutes from withdraw.
If I saw fit to watch the cutscene gallery, then I'd be wasting closer to an hour I could be spending with someone that actually needs more than my fairy as a main healer.
As far as Mentor Roulette goes, I'd rather do Castrum Meridianum or Praetorium than an EX primal nowadays because I can CLEAR these 2 dungeons and get a win from the mentor roulette, despite the unskippable cutscenes no less. People are still careless in doing EX primals via duty finder synced, more so being unprepared for mechanics being explained and being undergeared for them in several areas.
Last edited by RokkuEkkusu; 05-05-2019 at 02:41 PM.
My Current Characters:
Mikeru Takeuchi: http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/14812205/
Ekkusu Volnutt: http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/8909941/
Rokku Sigma: http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/5714962/
"Break a warrior's body, and he will thirst for vengeance. Break his spirit, and he will clamor for peace. Judge my methods distasteful if you will - but know that I seek to end this conflict, not prolong it." - Yadovv Gah, Final Fantasy XIV A Realm Reborn


A much better solution is for Castrum Meridianum and Praetorium to be made into single-player instances.. maybe with a party of NPCs to help you. It's a good use case for the Trust system. There's just no reason to have these special snowflake dungeons enforce party play.



How is using valuable development resources (like time and manpower) to change 2 dungeons that most of the playerbase will run once and never again a better solution than people just not running the instance if they can't deal with the cutscenes?A much better solution is for Castrum Meridianum and Praetorium to be made into single-player instances.. maybe with a party of NPCs to help you. It's a good use case for the Trust system. There's just no reason to have these special snowflake dungeons enforce party play.
And we don't even know how robust the trust system is, maybe it already is compatible with this?
WHERE IS THIS KETTLE EVERYONE KEEPS INTRODUCING ME TO?





Honestly, there are even new players or individuals that level up alts through the story that do not want to see the cutscenes, but are forced into them each time—even running Castrum and Praetorium unsynced with a level 70 forces you into them. I’d rather they get rid of the Roulette and just retailer them to Squadron/Trust instances. This way, they can remove the unskippable feature; so people that want to watch can, and those who don’t want to don’t have to.How is using valuable development resources (like time and manpower) to change 2 dungeons that most of the playerbase will run once and never again a better solution than people just not running the instance if they can't deal with the cutscenes?
And we don't even know how robust the trust system is, maybe it already is compatible with this?
I don’t mind them spending a bit of resources on programming NPCs to take the place of regular party members. It’s not like the MSQ Roulette is a fan favorite by any stretch—and the poetics can be easily obtained a variety of other ways.
Personally, I’m the opposite—while the MSQ dungeons are easy wins, I also prefer to feel engaged and those two dungeons leave me anything but. I’ve started running Mentor Roulette simply out of boredom, and as frustrating as it is to get Shiva EX with a bunch of players that don’t want to follow directions, at least I’m engaged in it.As far as Mentor Roulette goes, I'd rather do Castrum Meridianum or Praetorium than an EX primal nowadays because I can CLEAR these 2 dungeons and get a win from the mentor roulette, despite the unskippable cutscenes no less. People are still careless in doing EX primals via duty finder synced, more so being unprepared for mechanics being explained and being undergeared for them in several areas.
Last edited by HyoMinPark; 05-05-2019 at 03:21 PM.



...Untrue. If you are aware of what it entails. The cutscenes are part of it. If you are unwilling to sit through them you are unwilling to run the content. The cutscenes are currently part of it.
Then don't complain about it when you have to "endure" it. You picked the roulette, you know it's in there. Don't run it if you're not willing to do what it's asking you to do.
I'd be fine if there were alternatives available, and honestly I wonder why running it unsynced has the same limitations (is the flag an all or nothing thing?) Programming NPC's to deal with AOE and mechanics is a widely beneficial bit of programming and something I feel is worth the resources. Redoing the actual instances so that they're one player friendly is less so.Honestly, there are even new players or individuals that level up alts through the story that do not want to see the cutscenes, but are forced into them each time—even running Castrum and Praetorium unsynced with a level 70 forces you into them. I’d rather they get rid of the Roulette and just retailer them to Squadron/Trust instances. This way, they can remove the unskippable feature; so people that want to watch can, and those who don’t want to don’t have to.
I don’t mind them spending a bit of resources on programming NPCs to take the place of regular party members. It’s not like the MSQ Roulette is a fan favorite by any stretch—and the poetics can be easily obtained a variety of other ways.
Generally the argument against this is people will be pressured to vote "skip" even if they don't want to or one newbie will be majority voted into skipping when they don't want to. Again.. why are you running the roulette if you don't like the content? There are more "efficient" ways of getting tomes/XP
Last edited by Krotoan; 05-05-2019 at 03:30 PM.
WHERE IS THIS KETTLE EVERYONE KEEPS INTRODUCING ME TO?




But I did want to run the roulette until a dungeon that quite clearly didn't need me came up. Then I didn't want to run it, so I withdrew again. Not my problem if the party sometimes collapses due to me eating the initial penalty.
That's why I complain, and will continue to complain about it; I don't find it worth running these dungeons. And I'm always going to complain about substandard content.
I'm not here to clean up Square's self-admitted mistakes; Square needs to fix Square's mistakes.
Last edited by van_arn; 05-05-2019 at 03:35 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



