Suggestion: Link Calamity Salvager to Glamour Dresser

[MsQi]

While working on Garo and worrying about where to put all my items I came up with this idea. Why not just link the Calamity Salvager to the Glamour Dresser? Jut like you have a button for the armoire add a button for the CS and allow access to items unlocked in there. This would include Garo gear, Scion outfits and numerous other quest rewards.

[Raldo]

YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS PLEASE



Realistically, I suspect the problem there is that they intended for those pieces of gear to cost money to re-get. If they were to link them, they'll either need to abandon the money requirement, or add a way to pay every time you add something from there to a glamour plate. The money is chump change though. I'd gladly drop several million gil to have the ability to link them.

[MsQi]

YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS PLEASE



Realistically, I suspect the problem there is that they intended for those pieces of gear to cost money to re-get. If they were to link them, they'll either need to abandon the money requirement, or add a way to pay every time you add something from there to a glamour plate. The money is chump change though. I'd gladly drop several million gil to have the ability to link them.

I wouldn't mind paying it, I think the most you pay is 1000gil per item with many only 100gil. Remember though the Glamour dresser greatly reduced the requirement for glamour prisms which was a gil sink (for the clear prisms needed to craft them) and seal sink.

[Brightamethyst]

Personally I don't understand why everything available on the salvager can't just go into the armoire in the first place. The game knows we have the items. Why not let us put them in the armoire?

[Raldo]

Personally I don't understand why everything available on the salvager can't just go into the armoire in the first place. The game knows we have the items. Why not let us put them in the armoire?

The likely answer is that whether or not an item is in the armoire is yet another data point to track per-character. The Calamity Salvager, however, piggybacks off of achievement and quest completion data, so it essentially gets all of its "What am I allowed to sell the player?" information for free (no additional data to track that they weren't already tracking for other reasons).

[Brightamethyst]

Literally everything that can go in the armoire can also be repurchased from the calamity salvager. Why not also the other way around?

[Niwashi]

Literally everything that can go in the armoire can also be repurchased from the calamity salvager.

No. Calamity salvager doesn't have veteran rewards, and though I haven't checked lately, I don't think he has all the event rewards.

[Gula]

No. Calamity salvager doesn't have veteran rewards, and though I haven't checked lately, I don't think he has all the event rewards.

I think the Calamity Salvager should have vet rewards. Or at least the black swimsuit set. Because I really, really do not enjoy stealthing from Ul'dah to Mor Dhona at lv1. I don't know why it has to come in an envelope to take to Mor Dhona in the first place when literally everything else just comes as is in the mail. Gener related, yes. But that could be/should be trade-able via the city-state NPC.

[Kurando]

The Salvager also doesn't have event gear that you brought from the MogStation and not from obtaining the actual achievement. So if you missed an event but you brought the gear with cash a year later, discarding the gear means you have no way to get it back unless you purchase (with cash) yet again, so that's one issue right there.