is there a point to using Royal authority in your pally rotation?

[Izsha]

This part I want to highlight because that's the reason I threw the '300k' number out.

Last tier the number was 220k. This was if you had a Monk or Samurai (Before Merciful Eyes got changed and forever invalidated Seigan), and basically was the number you needed a lead by to maintain the hate lead until the Monk/Samurai or even Ninja until Diversion was ready for them again, assuming tank dps of around 4k and melee dps of around 6k. Conservative 'average' player numbers.

Contrary to what's being said in this thread (Just add more threat later), you lose -much more dps- by trying to rectify your threat lead later than just establishing it early.

Shirk. Unless you are trying to hero tank a dungeon, the 'survive until next diversion' is now 'Survive the party openers, then use TWO shirks within 2 minutes while diversion comes back up while using your enmity boosters (swipe, scorn, DAPlunge, IR onslaught, etc)'.

Yes ~300k is a reasonable number, but YOU dont have to generate all of it thanks to shirk multipliers and that still ignores ninja and the enmity bosted moves in rotation. AND you dont have to generate all if it up front. Shirks can be spaced out to generate even leverage higher enmity to multiply later. Pld can pull in sword oath if the party works together and it isnt because hes doing 300k in ROH. And thats before you acccount for the 'minor' dps loss options for enmity to tide you over if things get tight like using onslaught outside of IR, dark passenger, etc if you just need to make the last leg until shirk/diversion/whatever is up.

If you are under the 'assumption' that DPS are using diversion and that is the target to aim for, then you should also assume shirks. If you are getting zero assist of any kind then your party is dumb and will pay for it with lower tank dps to generate enmity. But id you are counting the time between diversions, then you are assuming your party is assisting and you have no need to do it all yourself.

To be quite honest, anyone i have played with that doesnt do basic things like hit diversion tends to be a bad/undergeared player anyway and has no prayer of catching my tank enmity anyway, or they are a good player and hit enmity buttons. Its a rather self solving problem.

[Kabooa]

Shirk.

Yep. It's factored in there, generally in Ninja no-tank stance openers.

[Izsha]

Yep. It's factored in there, generally in Ninja no-tank stance openers.

Except it's not. You cited the old number was 220k with 4k tabk and 6k dps. Over 2 min that is a difference of 240k (close to your 220k). That does not include shirk. Similarly the 300k claim based on current ilvls also does not include shirk. It's just the total enmity after raw tank dps that must be generated by ANY means to stay ahead and can be made by anything listed in my last post.

A properly executed war or drk pull straight into dps stance rotation combined with two shirks spread over 2 min is more than enough. I have been doing this for months without a ninja in my static.

[Kabooa]

Except it's not. You cited the old number was 220k with 4k tabk and 6k dps. Over 2 min that is a difference of 240k (close to your 220k). That does not include shirk. Similarly the 300k claim based on current ilvls also does not include shirk. It's just the total enmity after raw tank dps that must be generated by ANY means to stay ahead and can be made by anything listed in my last post.

A properly executed war or drk pull straight into dps stance rotation combined with two shirks spread over 2 min is more than enough. I have been doing this for months without a ninja in my static.

Diversion lasts 30 seconds. From the point diversion ends to the point you can use it again is 90 seconds. 1 shirk is assumed. 2 is not as this is a catch-all minimum that would work in every single encounter type, be it double bosses, add spawns, tank swapping add spawns, etc.

Obviously, the more specific the encounter, the more things within it that can change, but having a bare minimum to work with, as well as understanding the raw difference between an individual and another, provides a much better framework than the concept of 'I have A, that's all I need'.

It is an easy to digest understanding of the absolute minimum, but don't worry. The way things are going, the only thing that'll matter is the 'A'.