Except it was used for referring to races that only had one gender. Genderlocking was discussed because I played WH in the capacity regarding races being locked to a sex where applicable. Same with Tera. Im not saying there was not class locking going on either, or race locking. Often times, if you see it happen in one capacity, it usually incorporates the others as well. Furthermore, depending how you broaden out the search away from the usual MMO formula to other games, yes, you got gender locking in other online games too that had roleplaying elements.

Finally, you missed the core position of my point. Regardless of any position on it, those who are pushing the semantics argument are not having any difficulty understanding the exacts of what is being said, yet instead of focusing on those issues, the spotlight is being pushed over to dealing with word usage which then gets jumped over to "Since it's not genderlocking as I understand it, we should be happy we got what we did cause everything isnt that bad!" It's being used as a means of discrediting the complaint, rather than addressing it.

Also youre conflating Genderlocking terminology usage with Sexism and Homophobia. The former is discussing an issue where a race is limited to a sex, where the latter is assigning a motive as to why that decision was made. In the case of hte latter, they terminology was being used as intended. Meaning Sexism didnt mean some of other thing - they really meant it as sexism.