LS: Ability to kick inactives

[WhiteTerror]

Why is this not implemented yet? Server limitations?

[Xoo]

Because it would disrupt the flow of the typically convoluted UI and administrative options.

[Jinko]

It's coming in 1.22 i think.

[Xelsiar]

It does need to be implemented regardless. Moar LS OPTIONS!

[Antanias]

Not really that useful, I mean ppl could just kick offline players just to be complete jerks. What would be the point of joining an ls if this is added?

[darkstarpoet1]

Not really that useful, I mean ppl could just kick offline players just to be complete jerks. What would be the point of joining an ls if this is added?

not really useful? it's alot more useful then having to rebuild your ls and move all members to a new one every few months due to people being inactive taking up your limited member spots.

i understand someone could kick people being a jerk but, then again, if the leader is like that and does that to its members who would want to be in that ls in the first place? i know i wouldn't.

[Antanias]

not really useful? it's alot more useful then having to rebuild your ls and move all members to a new one every few months due to people being inactive taking up your limited member spots.

It's only good point.

i understand someone could kick people being a jerk but, then again, if the leader is like that and does that to its members who would want to be in that ls in the first place? i know i wouldn't.

That's one scenario, but let's say I decide to take a break from the game for a couple of months and I come back to find myself without an ls. I learn the ls didn't break or reform, but I'm not given a reason for why I'm let go...then what?

[Jinko]

That's one scenario, but let's say I decide to take a break from the game for a couple of months and I come back to find myself without an ls. I learn the ls didn't break or reform, but I'm not given a reason for why I'm let go...then what?

Then you have to accept that the reason for you being kicked was you were inactive.

This happens in other MMO's all the time, people don't want dead weight in their LS list especially if they never come back, of course if you say hey I'm going on holiday for a month don't kick me whilst I'm gone and they do then you might have a point.

If that was to happen then you just have to chalk it up to a jerk LS leader maybe.

The pros far outweigh the cons though.

[Antanias]

Then you have to accept that the reason for you being kicked was you were inactive.

This happens in other MMO's all the time, people don't want dead weight in their LS list especially if they never come back, of course if you say hey I'm going on holiday for a month don't kick me whilst I'm gone and they do then you might have a point.

If that was to happen then you just have to chalk it up to a jerk LS leader maybe.

Or find another ls and tell the previous one to f*** off

[viion]

It's only good point.


That's one scenario, but let's say I decide to take a break from the game for a couple of months and I come back to find myself without an ls. I learn the ls didn't break or reform, but I'm not given a reason for why I'm let go...then what?

If you tell your leader and they still kick you, do you want to be in that LS?

If you're inactive and the LS cannot invite ACTIVE people to the LS because you're taking up slots for a INACTIVE character why should you take priority?

Are you for real......................