Dear SE, I am a Healer

[Deceptus]

Healers are upset because they had some kind of "expectations" and SE didn't do what they expect...Its more about your own expectations, you were wrong.

Now healers are thinking "well well...we'll get a new healer for 6.0" maybe you won't...could shadowbringers be the last expansion? who knows, but healers are creating expectations again...and they shouldn't I think.

No, healers are upset because last expansion Yoshi-P said we didn't get a tank or a healer because they "wanted to balance what they had".

And they failed at it.

Now this expansion we don't get a healer because "We need to rebalance healers".

They didn't do it over the past two years, why should we expect them to make good on the promise this time? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

[hasana]

No one wants to answer this because the only way to refute this is to move the goal posts (but SAM fits SB more) because they literally caused this problem by adding two dps in the last expansion instead of 1+1 where they could have had actual parity right now instead of causing a problem they apparently NOW need to fix. Hilarious.

Let's be real, with their dart boarding healer balance they just didn't know how to add the 4th healer, same excuse as last time when they nerfed SCH to the ground to try to fix it, then they just spend the rest of the expansion buffing it back so now it is glued to the shielder slot once more. Time for another 2 years of fixing the fixes.

Okay let's assume for a moment they went sam+dancer or dancer+rdm in stormblood.

1)
3 tank
3 healer
4 melee
3 ranged
2 caster

2)
3 tank
3 healer
3 melee
3 ranged
3 caster

When we were deciding what the other role would be, the last remaining options were a third ranged DPS or a fourth healer. However, we were still struggling with balancing the three existing healers, and SCH was always dominant because of the fairy. Even if we re-balanced them again for 5.0, and even if they also have the shield healer vs pure healer dichotomy, we thought it would be better to solidify the balance between the three healers instead of trying to balance four. By adding a third ranged DPS, we could round out the number of jobs per role.

if 1) you just put caster instead of ranged
if 2) they would have chosen between tank-melee-ranged or caster anyway

So either way healer wasn't an option, deal with it.

[Vaer]

Okay let's assume for a moment they went sam+dancer or dancer+rdm in stormblood.

1)
3 tank
3 healer
4 melee
3 ranged
2 caster

2)
3 tank
3 healer
3 melee
3 ranged
3 caster



if 1) you just put caster instead of ranged
if 2) they would have chosen between tank-melee-ranged or caster anyway

So either way healer wasn't an option, deal with it.

Option 1 makes no sense because that is just a variation of the same setup that caused this problem. (the imbalance)

When we were deciding what the other role would be, the last remaining options were a third ranged DPS or a fourth healer. However, we were still struggling with balancing the three existing healers, and SCH was always dominant because of the fairy. Even if we re-balanced them again for 5.0, and even if they also have the shield healer vs pure healer dichotomy, we thought it would be better to solidify the balance between the three healers instead of trying to balance four. By adding a third ranged DPS, we could round out the number of jobs per role.

[Deceptus]

Okay let's assume for a moment they went sam+dancer or dancer+rdm in stormblood.

1)
3 tank
3 healer
4 melee
3 ranged
2 caster

2)
3 tank
3 healer
3 melee
3 ranged
3 caster

if 1) you just put caster instead of ranged
if 2) they would have chosen between tank-melee-ranged or caster anyway

If they had went Option 2 in your scenario there would be no backlash at all because the dev's would have a valid premise to start from. All jobs are equally represented so this time we chose X and Y.

So either way healer wasn't an option, deal with it.

Completely unnecessary (emphasis mine). You're not helping your case by spouting such divisiveness.

[cicatriz313]

If they had went Option 2 in your scenario there would be no backlash at all because the dev's would have a valid premise to start from. All jobs are equally represented so this time we chose X and Y.

Lol we both know that if they then had done Gunbreaker and Sam after choosing option 2 we would be in the same spot. Healers are upset about not having an option after so long, they don't care about the reasoning. To prove my point, I already linked the reasoning Yoshida gave after you specifically said they never gave a reason besides "balance", and you've completely ignored it.

[RukiaFae]

Yoshi P: Healers please adjust for six years while we create more limited jobs and balance healers (jk on the balance part, we need to keep using that excuse).

Healers:Ummmm what.

[Miste]

Lol we both know that if they then had done Gunbreaker and Sam after choosing option 2 we would be in the same spot. Healers are upset about not having an option after so long, they don't care about the reasoning. To prove my point, I already linked the reasoning Yoshida gave after you specifically said they never gave a reason besides "balance", and you've completely ignored it.

Why does their reasoning matter though when there was multiple ways they could have fixed it? That is why they are getting feedback about it.

At least for me I am not "ignoring" their reasoning. I just feel they are really flimsy excuses and they still deserve some criticism for the choices they made.

1. They want to wait to balance the healers we have now.

-They had 4 years to balance healers, that is a really long time in a game's life, yet here we are again. Also, balancing the 3 we have now MAY be pointless since when they add the fourth onto the scale it may get tipped again. Keeping jobs balanced is a never ending problem when developing a MMO so they are trying to avoid something that cannot be avoided.

2. They wanted to round out the number of jobs per role.

-They added SAM in 4.0 which moved the melee DPS from 3 to 4, while physical ranged still sat at 2. Blows their reasoning out the window there since they caused this whole problem by doing this. If they wanted to round out the jobs per role then they aren't really doing a great job at it so far.

As a paying customer waiting 6 years for a healer is not acceptable to me so I posted my feedback about it and how I don't like that the healer role is being ignored. I feel like I am quite a reasonable person and rarely had any complaints about this game either, so if someone like me has an issue it is probably a bit telling since I am usually quite easy to please.

It's as simple as that. Their reasons do not fix my personal issues with how this was handled because I can think of ways they could have fixed this with better planning so I felt like sending them my feedback about it, and it seems I am not alone in my sentiments.

[cicatriz313]

Why does their reasoning matter though when there was multiple ways they could have fixed it? That is why they are getting feedback about it.

At least for me I am not "ignoring" their reasoning. I just feel they are really flimsy excuses and they still deserve some criticism for the choices they made.

1. They want to wait to balance the healers we have now.

-They had 4 years to balance healers, that is a really long time in a game's life, yet here we are again. Also, balancing the 3 we have now MAY be pointless since when they add the fourth onto the scale it may get tipped again. Keeping jobs balanced is a never ending problem when developing a MMO so they are trying to avoid something that cannot be avoided.

2. They wanted to round out the number of jobs per role.

-They added SAM in 4.0 which moved the melee DPS from 3 to 4, while physical ranged still sat at 2. Blows their reasoning out the window there since they caused this whole problem by doing this. If they wanted to round out the jobs per role then they aren't really doing a great job at it so far.

As a paying customer waiting 6 years for a healer is not acceptable to me so I posted my feedback about it and how I don't like that the healer role is being ignored. I feel like I am quite a reasonable person and rarely had any complaints about this game either, so if someone like me has an issue it is probably a bit telling since I am usually quite easy to please.

It's as simple as that. Their reasons do not fix my personal issues with how this was handled because I can think of ways they could have fixed this with better planning so I felt like sending them my feedback about it, and it seems I am not alone in my sentiments.

That's fine. I wasn't talking to you. I was specifically responding to the quoted individual because I had responded to him/her before after they had said the reasoning was never given. Besides the way you made your point in the first post (blog-like fashion) I have no issues with you being upset. In fact I was pretty surprised it wasn't tank/healer too. But no matter how they did it, not getting a healer after this long would have led to this backlash no matter what route they took. The whole Sam thing was a different expansion, different circumstances. I think it's pretty fair to say that they knew they were doing Doma, they knew that the playerbase favored Samurai, and it was an easy win to include them at that time. Maybe the better argument would be they could have made RDM somehow into a healer? But even then, probably not.

[Greywolfamakir]

No, healers are upset because last expansion Yoshi-P said we didn't get a tank or a healer because they "wanted to balance what they had".

And they failed at it.

Now this expansion we don't get a healer because "We need to rebalance healers".

They didn't do it over the past two years, why should we expect them to make good on the promise this time? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

SE didn't say "You'll get a new Healer for 5.0" or something like that...Its all IN YOUR MIND and your own expectations...

Since Gunbreaker was announced, every healer was thinking "Yeah, we'll get a new Healer" and if you say "I didn't think it" you are a liar.

But when SE show the Slide where you can read "Ranged-DPS" it was like a jar of cold water over you...it was TOTALLY UNEXPECTED.

Its normal to feel frustrated but the cause is just your own expectations.

[Paladinleeds]

SE didn't say "You'll get a new Healer for 5.0" or something like that...Its all IN YOUR MIND and your own expectations...

Since Gunbreaker was announced, every healer was thinking "Yeah, we'll get a new Healer" and if you say "I didn't think it" you are a liar.

But when SE show the Slide where you can read "Ranged-DPS" it was like a jar of cold water over you...it was TOTALLY UNEXPECTED.

Its normal to feel frustrated but the cause is just your own expectations.

Actually if I remember rightly, they did say we'd get love (reasonable assumption: new jobs) in 5.0 when they said we only got DPS for 4.0. Given their reasoning was to balance tanks and healers. Then they changed it. I think we have reasonable cause to be annoyed. And given what they said, and they completely fluffed it...