
Originally Posted by
SturmChurro
I brought up au ra in one post - complimenting another person's prior choices. I am talking about female roe in the female hrothgar thread, because female roe was used as a comparative basis in SE's own artwork. Not only that the Queen of Bozja - who is a roe - replaced a female hrothgar. So, there is actually a relevance in discussing ROE, there is no relevance in discussing au ra in this thread. Since that artwork also depicted female hrothgar being at comparable height to roe, with probably feline features. So, neither miqo'te 2.0, or au ra are applicable, in my opinion.
I am not "putting down" roe* either. I am saying how it is. Simple as that. Some people like that aesthetic, I get that, but as I have said numerous times, I don't think it should be used as a basis for female hrothgar. Seemingly the references to female au ra, have been since I've been posting, and to me, they are jabs at my player avatar. Just like when I've been a female miqo'te in the past, because apparently, I cannot have diverse opinions, if I am playing either race. I have said for years, that I have wanted female hrothgar to be like male hrothgar, a beast race. Fierce, tough, athletic, proud. Closer to female highlander, and similar height as viera. Not hunched.