Thread: So we're just repeating the mistakes of 1.0 again?

I was really holding out for male Viera. Looking at what we got, I wish we were given a proper male + female Ronso set than... this. I find the Hrothgar very unappealing, but at least that would have felt more... equal.

I just..
I was really looking forward to changing to a bunny boi.
Really disappointed by this decision, i feel kind of betrayed. A lot of people look down on gender-locking and i thought the devs were above that.
Sigh.

Originally Posted by splinter1545

Damn, I never knew that 1.0 biggest downfall, was genderlocked races. It couldn't have been any of the other big problems it had.

This is literally my favorite comment thank you lmao.

Waooo someone today did not have a soil vanilla cappuccino

Originally Posted by SonKevin

Why are you playing as a C@ instead of a Roe then?

I think you missed the "What also sucks is males being pigeon-holed into being super masculine. Give them more options too." part.

They want smaller, more effeminate-looking males. Many were hoping Viera would be a reverse of the Au Ra sexual dimorphism, with the females being larger than the males.

Originally Posted by splinter1545

While you didn't directly state it, it's heavily implied by the title of the thread, as well the genderlock being the main topic of the post.

I literally didn't it. You inferred it, nothing more.
Fact: one of the mistakes of 1.0 is they didn't finish their races, leading to player outcry that they add the neglected races' counterparts. (with some delicious irony of now male miqo'te avatars saying that adding male miqo'te wouldn't make sense and that it would Be Bad)
Fact: they're doing it again.
That's it.

Originally Posted by KeyboardFacerollname

I think you missed the "What also sucks is males being pigeon-holed into being super masculine. Give them more options too." part.

They want smaller, more effeminate-looking males. Many were hoping Viera would be a reverse of the Au Ra sexual dimorphism, with the females being larger than the males.

Why would they have thought that when we had literal design concepts showing them as bulky bunnies? People are upset they didn't get something THEY WERE NEVER GOING TO GET.

Originally Posted by SonKevin

Tbh, it didn't even run well on super high end PCs.

But when it rained did the characters look like CPR dummies?

Got Pool of Tribute in trial roulette and big off did everyone look awful.

Originally Posted by SonKevin

Why would they have thought that when we had literal design concepts showing them as bulky bunnies? People are upset they didn't get something THEY WERE NEVER GOING TO GET.

The female Au Ra concepts weren't diminutive waifus. They were basically succubi.

When the models came out, the males were 7' tall warrior guys and the women were 5' tall cutesy anime girls.

Originally Posted by KeyboardFacerollname

The female Au Ra concepts weren't diminutive waifus. They were basically succubi.

When the models came out, the males were 7' tall warrior guys and the women were 5' tall cutesy anime girls.

Personally I think we should delete Au Ra because their concept art was misleading AF.