Male Viera as a playable character! show your support

[Kyuuen]

I'd like them to be a bit shorter then the females(Because male bunnies tend to be smaller), but not to the child-like level. Somewhat cute bunny bois would be nice.

That's about where I'm at with this idea. I think the ultra short like the final picture in the OP might be a few steps too far, but perhaps something like the tallest male setting being somewhere around the shortest female setting, maybe a little taller.

[Vahlnir]

Although I agree the move is narrow-minded and sexist, calling them out on it aggressively isn't going to fix anything. We have to be respectful about it, expose our point of view and insist on having them see why this was NOT a right move. We can do this, I'm sure.

There is nothing sexist about this. Nothing at all. I would agree that they are at times narrow minded, but not in this instance. Time constraints was the reason that was given. That neither confirms their development or rules them out. Was is truly narrow mindedness? No one really knows. But they never said "we don't want to do this because reasons", they said that they ran out of time. Regardless, nothing about this is sexist. The word is being thrown around so freely that it sickens me. Apparently no one knows what it truly means around here. All of that said, I still think that there should be male Viera and female Hrothgar. And they very well could happen.

[Matsuda]

SE Please don't gender lock these new races! The players spoke out against this practice with Mi'qote and Roegadyn many years ago! The community hasn't changed its stance on this! +1 for no gender-locked races ever!

[Momo_Saneko]

+1 For male Vieras!

[Dhanauranji]

There is nothing sexist about this. Nothing at all. I would agree that they are at times narrow minded, but not in this instance. Time constraints was the reason that was given. That neither confirms their development or rules them out. Was is truly narrow mindedness? No one really knows. But they never said "we don't want to do this because reasons", they said that they ran out of time. Regardless, nothing about this is sexist. The word is being thrown around so freely that it sickens me. Apparently no one knows what it truly means around here. All of that said, I still think that there should be male Viera and female Hrothgar. And they very well could happen.

I could make a million excuses on why I didn't do something and it would still not be a reason. "Running out of time" is hardly an excuse nowadays, too.

And hey, not saying they're sexist but that the move in itself is. Not considering people wanting to play the other gender can be misunderstood as such, even if you call "time" or "lore" as the factors to outright dismiss it, which are weak arguments to begin with (even more when they ran into that problem in 1.0 with Roegadyns, Highlanders and Mi'qotes, having players expressing their opinions once more).

[Alex073088]

I am really sad that male Viera were not considered, I really hope this changes in the future.

[Vahlnir]

I could make a million excuses on why I didn't do something and it would still not be a reason. "Running out of time" is hardly an excuse nowadays, too.

And hey, not saying they're sexist but that the move in itself is. Not considering people wanting to play the other gender can be misunderstood as such, even if you call "time" or "lore" as the factors to outright dismiss it, which are weak arguments to begin with (even more when they ran into that problem in 1.0 with Roegadyns, Highlanders and Mi'qotes).

The move isn't sexist either. I could give a few descriptions of this move like "oh, that's a shame" or "that sucks". But calling the move sexist hurts your credibility considerably just like everyone else calling it sexist. And by hurting your credibility I mean making it basically nonexistent. If you people want to be taken seriously stop calling everything sexist.

[Dhanauranji]

I mean, look at this:



SO FLUFFY.

And, and...



*sweats profusely*

[Kazran]

I mean, look at this:



SO FLUFFY.

And, and...



*sweats profusely*

THESE ARE MY DREAM!

[Dhanauranji]

The move isn't sexist either. I could give a few descriptions of this move like "oh, that's a shame" or "that sucks". But calling the move sexist hurts your credibility considerably just like everyone else calling it sexist. And by hurting your credibility I mean making it basically nonexistent. If you people want to be taken seriously stop calling everything sexist.

I think you have a problem with sexism as a whole, since you're now jabbing onto my credibility by being condescending (I mean, you're one hair short of an ad hominem there).

"If you people", really? Take a chill pill, bruv.

Also: ignoring you. I'm not gonna bring negativity to what has been a pretty awesome thread so far.