That was part of their original plan, but people cried foul.On the inactive accounts, they should have just moved them automatically but they shouldn't be in their calculations for the cap space on each server. It's like annexing two cities together and counting the dead bodies in the graveyard in the population of the new city.... it doesn't really make sense.
Wrong. Their original plan was to put all inactive accounts on a remote server where they will stay until the 2.0 (since everybody moved to a new server anyway). To use the same example I used, it would be like moving all tombs in a waste and, if they miraculously wake up, they would render alone in a wasteland. That was their original plan.
Last edited by IronSoup; 03-02-2012 at 05:01 AM.
No, the original plan was to move everyone off of the servers and have everyone partake in the transfer process, thus logically inactive people won't be doing this and will be regulated between the servers after active players are done.Wrong. Their original plan was to put all inactive accounts on a remote server where they will stay until the 2.0. To use the same example I used, it would be like moving all tombs in a waste and, if they miraculously wake up, they would render alone in a wasteland. That was their original plan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.