Results 1 to 10 of 165

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by IronSoup View Post
    On the inactive accounts, they should have just moved them automatically but they shouldn't be in their calculations for the cap space on each server. It's like annexing two cities together and counting the dead bodies in the graveyard in the population of the new city.... it doesn't really make sense.
    That was part of their original plan, but people cried foul.
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player
    IronSoup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    115
    Character
    Iron Soup
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
    That was part of their original plan, but people cried foul.
    Wrong. Their original plan was to put all inactive accounts on a remote server where they will stay until the 2.0 (since everybody moved to a new server anyway). To use the same example I used, it would be like moving all tombs in a waste and, if they miraculously wake up, they would render alone in a wasteland. That was their original plan.
    (3)
    Last edited by IronSoup; 03-02-2012 at 05:01 AM.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by IronSoup View Post
    Wrong. Their original plan was to put all inactive accounts on a remote server where they will stay until the 2.0. To use the same example I used, it would be like moving all tombs in a waste and, if they miraculously wake up, they would render alone in a wasteland. That was their original plan.
    No, the original plan was to move everyone off of the servers and have everyone partake in the transfer process, thus logically inactive people won't be doing this and will be regulated between the servers after active players are done.
    (6)