Creepy ffxiv Bots

[syntaxlies]

they do ban the ones they catch doing something

the problem is, not all of them are always botting, and just perhaps...what they are doing isnt botting


i can just imagine the person sitting there 8 boxing it with his main and 7 mules all doing leves together
and a gm goes to investigate, and all he sees is 7 people sitting afk, and now and then hitting a button to start a leve
still nothing illegal there

then he sees the high person completing them

still not illegal

if they try to talk to said afk people who are actively gaining exp, the person using all 8 of them can easily respond on any of them that he happens to see said message on

hes not afk, hes just playing all 8 characters, again, nothing illegal there



as long as no 3rd party software is being used that is deemed illegal by the TOS, then no rule is bring broken



thats the problem, we may see it as being wrong(i personaly dont like them either) but when it comes down to it, a rule has to be broken in order for them to be punished, and no one seems to be able to point out what rule is actualy being broken

all i see is a bunch of people claiming they are botting, but how are they botting? 7 people afk while 1 person is actively completing all the leves is NOT botting unless they have a program somehow doing it all for them, which no one has been able to prove yet, and im sure SE is looking at them and seeing the exact same thing i am trying to explain to you.



In the future, these will be rmt however, and thats when they will be caught, and banned, but until the rules are actualy broken, there is nothing to ban them on

all i can say is you could have defended OJ

[TheVedis]

all i can say is you could have defended OJ

OJ was easy to defend

as someone who actualy knows how the law works, he was 100% innocent under the system we have in america

was he guilty as far as having actualy commited the crime? probly, but since they couldnt prove it, well, thats how it goes down

In america, we do not punish people for what we can not prove, even if we know they did it, we still have to prove it

[syntaxlies]

OJ was easy to defend

as someone who actualy knows how the law works, he was 100% innocent under the system we have in america

was he guilty as far as having actualy commited the crime? probly, but since they couldnt prove it, well, thats how it goes down

In america, we do not punish people for what we can not prove, even if we know they did it, we still have to prove it

if the glove dont fit, you must acquit.