Are inactive accounts/characters priority over transfers?

[Elexia]

Yes they are priority, that's what the community wanted and why they were against option 4. That and they didn't have contact with friends outside of the game to coordinate and say:

"Hey buddy, let's go to world 3, k? k."

why do people complaining give others the right to act so vulgar. You are not on some pedestal to tell others what to do.

It's not being vulgar, saying you shat the bed would be vulgar, which is exactly what happened lol.

[Phobos]

I couldn't care less about inactives myself, but I personally didn't want the current player pool from my server to be broken up.

Just saying, there are other reason's to want this method of a merger than just "not screwing over inactive players"

[Elexia]

I couldn't care less about inactives myself, but I personally didn't want the current player pool from my server to be broken up.

Just saying, there are other reason's to want this method of a merger than just "not screwing over inactive players"

While true, if you look back on the "Not option 4!" "But what about people who come back? blah blah" threads, that isn't the main reason, the main reason is because they somehow have zero contact with "friends" outside of the game.