Are inactive accounts/characters priority over transfers?

[syntaxlies]

Serdapi is mostly a troll as of late. I've been unsuccessful in persuading him to present his opinions in a more civil and respectful manner. And then discovered he is a sadist bored at work. He's been blocked and having seen your response re: him, it appears he has not improved, so he will remain indefinitely on the block factor.

Thank you for the confirmation Syntax.

blocked him as well

[neorei]

I supported a full Server to server move and no one moves at all, yes people are inactive but in the long run, but i don't think SE based this decision on inactives, I may be wrong though. We shall see when the actual merge happens and how the population is.

[Serdapi]

blocked him as well

Thank you. Two less ignorant individuals I have deal with on these forums.

1. RPist who doesn't know the difference between trolling and criticism (maybe I should create a new troll thread in order to trying to enlighten again....)

2. Guy against vulgar acronyms.

[Gath]

Thank you. Two less ignorant individuals I have deal with on these forums.

1. RPist who doesn't know the difference between trolling and criticism (maybe I should create a new troll thread in order to trying to enlighten again....)

2. Guy against vulgar acronyms.

Hello, everybody's favorite person, Gath, has made an appearance. Gath thinks you use the words "vulgar" and "acronyms" too much.

Gath thinks those two words are the only "dictionary" words you know.

Gath was in favor of the original merger plan, but, Gath won't complain because with all the complaints SE will probably address this soon, and when Gath means soon, Gath means the same day the application period ends.

Gath's 1 gil is worth more than your 1 gil.

[Firon]

Hello, everybody's favorite person, Gath, has made an appearance. Gath thinks you use the words "vulgar" and "acronyms" too much.

Gath thinks those two words are the only "dictionary" words you know.

Gath was in favor of the original merger plan, but, Gath won't complain because with all the complaints SE will probably address this soon, and when Gath means soon, Gath means the same day the application period ends.

Gath's 1 gil is worth more than your 1 gil.

lol/10char

[Serdapi]

Hello, everybody's favorite person, Gath, has made an appearance. Gath thinks you use the words "vulgar" and "acronyms" too much.

Gath thinks those two words are the only "dictionary" words you know.

Gath was in favor of the original merger plan, but, Gath won't complain because with all the complaints SE will probably address this soon, and when Gath means soon, Gath means the same day the application period ends.

Gath's 1 gil is worth more than your 1 gil.

lol Gath's post are so funny. I'm glad nobody takes him serious. Keep on Gath.

[Fiosha_Maureiba]

I'm looking at a tag in the thread and it looks like I have an admirer.

Anyhew, came to link over to the info REDface0 has resurfaced:
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...ing-Up-Servers

... Inactive characters/non-subscribers are also counted, but they are not factored into the maximum limit of active characters allocated to each server. ...

I suspect we will see some updates regarding this. Ragnarok may be their target migration server since that population would have started out at 0 in its creation. I suspect people and their mules populated a lot more space than anticipated. And that EU players did not flock over to Ragnarok also as anticipated.

[Noir]

Or are all of the people in my shell waiting on 2.0 who didn't pay for this month going to be moved to some random server because they didn't pay this month?

When a server "fills" with transfers, will inactive accounts that have said server as their default merge server be moved to another (lower population) server? Or do the inactive accounts get moved to their default server in the merge regardless?

Would like to know. Don't see the answer to this anywhere.

I told you all... That the game sold 500.000 copies approximately. Meaning 500.000 people spread all over. People laughed about it. Now it's my turn. Kefka laugh on all of you that didn't move because of full worlds. WHOOhohohoohhoho. /kefka laugh out.

[Picoman]

Thank you. Two less ignorant individuals I have deal with on these forums.

1. RPist who doesn't know the difference between trolling and criticism (maybe I should create a new troll thread in order to trying to enlighten again....)

2. Guy against vulgar acronyms.

Yeah he blocked me too. Apparently his excuse for being lazy, half-assed and vacuous is because he replays using and iPad... What a hero eh?

[weeble]

i think the very first option was better, i wasn't able to post at the time cause i wasn't playing and inactive so i couldn't post in these forums>< but now every inactive shares servers. where as older way we could of all moved to 1 server and had 2000 very active players all on one server. dunno why things keep getting messed up for the worse ...every step forward then more steps back...

the biggest problem in this game is server population and i don't think this merger is even going to fix that issue, it just juggled everyone around instead. all inactives should be put in same 1 server. or they should of at very least had 1 server that was absolutely new and all actives could of went there first till it filled up. ....seriously when i move servers and i'm still having issues with population i'm seriously not coming back till 2.0 ...and yeah i get that it was people complaining that got the merge type changed but ...again they are the ones that stayed. ...lol they don't count for the majority and SE should know that by now.

tldr, all servers have inactives, all servers were empty, combining 2 servers only doubles the population at most and 100 X2 is only 200people and the rest are inactives. this doesn't help at all. ty.