Results 1 to 10 of 388

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    190
    So, if I understand this correct, the main reason people are struggling to find a server to transfer to that actually has space, is because SE have allotted server space for all those that no longer play and have inactive accounts. Even worse it could be that many of those inactive players could have up to 3 seperate accounts each.

    Once this has rattled out and we all log into our new servers, they may not be as populated as we were led to believe due to the number of inactives.

    I still think that we have the best option compared to the one SE originally proposed for us, how were we supposed to know that SE would set the limits of the servers so low?
    (1)


  2. #2
    Player
    Wynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,977
    Character
    Aedan Yarborough
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by AshToreth View Post
    So, if I understand this correct, the main reason people are struggling to find a server to transfer to that actually has space, is because SE have allotted server space for all those that no longer play and have inactive accounts. Even worse it could be that many of those inactive players could have up to 3 seperate accounts each.

    Once this has rattled out and we all log into our new servers, they may not be as populated as we were led to believe due to the number of inactives.

    I still think that we have the best option compared to the one SE originally proposed for us, how were we supposed to know that SE would set the limits of the servers so low?
    Yep...

    Which is why everyone that began frothing at the mouth when Yoshi first announced the plans are less than bright. Serves them all right, in my opinion. The phrase "be careful what you wish for because you just might get it" never ringed so true.
    (5)

  3. #3
    Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by Wynn View Post
    Yep...

    Which is why everyone that began frothing at the mouth when Yoshi first announced the plans are less than bright. Serves them all right, in my opinion. The phrase "be careful what you wish for because you just might get it" never ringed so true.
    As I understand it, from dev quotes I read somewhere sometime, inactive players aren't counted at all. They're in limbo. *fishes for dev quote*

    Edit: Never mind. I completely read that wrong.
    (0)
    Last edited by Answa; 03-01-2012 at 05:58 PM.

  4. #4
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Answa View Post
    As I understand it, from dev quotes I read somewhere sometime, inactive players aren't counted at all. They're in limbo. *fishes for dev quote*
    I will gladly retract what I said if this is true, I sure hope so
    (0)


  5. #5
    Player
    Wynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,977
    Character
    Aedan Yarborough
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by AshToreth View Post
    I will gladly retract what I said if this is true, I sure hope so
    The quote he is looking for is this one:

    Quote Originally Posted by Bayhone
    In response to a player asking whether or not inactive accounts would be able to transfer:

    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida
    Unfortunately, this isn’t likely to change from what was outlined in the previous announcement. In keeping with the concept behind the World Merge, the primary goal is to maintain a balance of active players (i.e. characters) on the servers. If we allow hundreds of thousands of currently inactive characters to freely transfer across Worlds, there’s a high risk that our calculations for time zone peak numbers on every World will end up in chaos.

    Sorry to confirm this, but world transfer requests will be sticking to the system explained in the previous topic.
    All this means is all inactive characters won't get an option to transfer to another world. They will stay on the one they are at.
    (0)

  6. #6
    Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by AshToreth View Post
    I will gladly retract what I said if this is true, I sure hope so
    From the first question here, I had read that as pertaining to inactive characters during the whole process when I first saw this weeks ago. When I reread it just now, I noticed it just spoke about World transfer applications, not the default world choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    In response to a player asking whether or not inactive accounts would be able to transfer:
    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida View Post
    Unfortunately, this isn’t likely to change from what was outlined in the previous announcement. In keeping with the concept behind the World Merge, the primary goal is to maintain a balance of active players (i.e. characters) on the servers. If we allow hundreds of thousands of currently inactive characters to freely transfer across Worlds, there’s a high risk that our calculations for time zone peak numbers on every World will end up in chaos.

    Sorry to confirm this, but world transfer requests will be sticking to the system explained in the previous topic.
    Edit: Damn you, Wynn!
    (0)

  7. #7
    Player
    Xianghua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    405
    Character
    Fiona Valencia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by AshToreth View Post
    So, if I understand this correct, the main reason people are struggling to find a server to transfer to that actually has space, is because SE have allotted server space for all those that no longer play and have inactive accounts. Even worse it could be that many of those inactive players could have up to 3 seperate accounts each.

    Once this has rattled out and we all log into our new servers, they may not be as populated as we were led to believe due to the number of inactives.

    I still think that we have the best option compared to the one SE originally proposed for us, how were we supposed to know that SE would set the limits of the servers so low?
    SE gave us all the information we needed. He said he wanted around 2k and said servers would fill up quickly after the applications begin.

    Option 2 was the best option for people who wanted to keep the communities we have now together while giving people a chance to move if they so choose. This is the Option most demanded and got.
    Not understanding that there are more inactive players. thus making it where majority of spots are taken up.
    (2)
    Last edited by Xianghua; 03-01-2012 at 06:01 PM.

Tags for this Thread