Give the possible Eureka 5.X its own weapon, and separate Relic from it

[Alucard135]

But has since come to refer to the general weapon that an expansion has that gets upgraded throughout the duration and ends up being the big flashy weapon at the end of an expansion (And thus, a long grind) that sometimes ends up being BiS once it reaches this end stage.

Ok, this is your definition of the relic. So let’s examine what you’re saying after.

Yet, then they get really pissy whenever we have the gall to ask that we get our content BACK and that Eureka gets something new and unique for it to work on instead, something that could equal that of Raid weapons (Thus surpassing Tome and Primal weapons)

Why does it have to be called something new and unique? Why not just call it a relic, since it follows the same definition you laid out for the term relic. It’s a weapon you get by upgrading through the duration of the expansion, ends up being a flashy weapon and at the end of the expansion it becomes BiS. And might I add, that I also consider the relic the weapon with the purple background.

What I’m against is saying “separate Relic from Eureka content” and not saying “give us another relic content along side Eureka”. This creates the impression that it’s going to be something worse than what we know as a relic (it won’t be ultimate level for sure). And the comment I replied to explicitly stated that they’re not advocating two relics. So that doesn’t make sense not to call them relics if they both follow the exact same definition.

OP isn't advocating 2 relics. Classic Relic + Eureka gets its own Weapon and Gear

But no, act as if Relic being removed from being exclusively Eureka means replacing it with hot garbage and/or making it so that Eureka players can't work towards it at all.

Well, I never said I’m against the relic being obtained from both ways. I’m totally fine with that. But, again, I’m against when people are asking for a separation of the relic from Eureka and giving Eureka another weapon and refuse to call it a relic. Then what prevents it from being another garbage weapon?

I know I’m picking on wording, but if they’re both relics, then just simply ask for a relic weapon for the old content style and not separate relic from Eureka if they’re both going to be relics in the end and follow the exact same definition.

Else we’d have more comments like the one I replied to saying they don’t want two relics.